×

Usamos cookies para ayudar a mejorar LingQ. Al visitar este sitio, aceptas nuestras politicas de cookie.


image

It`s Okay To Be Smart, Humans Are Smart. Why Are Babies So Unsmart?

Humans Are Smart. Why Are Babies So Unsmart?

Subject A dash 34, neonatal intelligence battery.

Trial 17, hour 4, let's just get on with this.

Ok, solve for… solve for X.

Looking for more… numbers.

We'll just, I'm gonna, we'll get back to that one later.

Ok, I'm just going to start my watch.

[bang bang bang] Unorthodox.

[banging and baby noises] It is challenging.

[banging] We're at 47 minutes.

Oh, well if that's how you're gonna play then fine.

What is the relationship between these two objects?

[baby noises] I think he's gonna get this one!

And he's eating it.

You can't cheat.

Marks off for that.

Ok this… ahhhhh.

Can you spell…

Can you spell pituit- Can you spell P?

That is incorrect.

Hey Smart People, Joe here.

The first thing a baby giraffe experiences after being born is a 2 meter fall straight

down to the ground.

But within an hour, it's standing, walking, and nursing on its own.

And a blue whale calf, after nearly a year growing inside mom, can swim to the surface

moments after being born.

Human babies on the other hand?

We're born unable to move or eat on our own, we can't communicate or fully sense

our world, and we leak.

Everywhere.

If humans are so smart, why are our babies so… un-smart?

Human babies begin life so undeveloped, that many people refer to a baby's first few

months of life as the fourth trimester.

Compared to other animals, we lie on the “altricial” end of the spectrum.

Compare that with, say, a baby cow, a precocial animal, whose brain and body is developed

enough that they can stand and run just moments after being born.

Tiny humans require a ton of parental care before we're ready to be on our own.

Our parents not only grow us for 9 months or so, they carry us, they feed us, they keep

us from dying, and teach us how to provide for ourselves for 15, 18 years… heck these

days even over 30 isn't unheard of.

It's actually totally normal.

Ma!

I'm shooting a video down here!

Gah!

Have to start over, edit this.

That's because, well, our brains come out half-cooked at best.

When we're born our brain is around 30% the size of our adult brain.

That's the smallest of all of our primate relatives.

Why does our smart species have such small-brained babies?

For a long time, scientists' best answer to that question was the obstetric dilemma.

Basically, our brains come out as big as they physically can be.

The obstetric dilemma goes like this: if our brains were any bigger at birth, they wouldn't

fit out the birth canal.

And if female pelvises were any wider, they would make walking and running less efficient…

which might not affect your life that much, but would've made it easier for our ancestors

to become dinner… which means no babies, which means no you or me.

So here, natural selection found a compromise: mom's pelvis stays narrow enough to walk

and run, and babies are born earlier so their noggins don't get stuck.

It's a pretty logical idea.

But it doesn't hold water.

Male and female bodies do have significant anatomical differences, but research has found

that wider or roomier pelvises don't make walking and running, AKA “locomotion”

less efficient.

And, some women already have pelvic openings wide enough to fit bigger heads and brains.

Not every woman does, but if there was strong pressure from natural selection for roomier

pelvises, they'd have become more common.

So pelvis size isn't why our babies come out half-baked.

The real answer might have more to do with metabolism.

The bigger a developing baby gets, the more it demands from mom.

I mean, women grow a completely new organ, the placenta, not to mention a complete human

being, inside their bodies, and that takes energy!

It might be that mom's ability to provide enough energy for growing baby determines

when baby is born.

Humans and all other animals have what's called a basal metabolic rate.

It's how much energy we burn when we're not doing anything else.

A Tour de France cyclist at peak human performance can hit maybe four or five times their base

metabolism.

But most of us normal humans?

We max out at around two times our basal rate.

We just can't run our biological engines any higher for very long.

Like overclocking a CPU, there's just a physical limit to how much extra energy we

can create.

For the last third of pregnancy, and even into nursing, a mother is at the limit, burning

twice as much energy as before baby.

Nine months happens to be right about the time a growing baby starts to demand more

energy than mom can provide, so it's born.

It's called the EGG hypothesis, or “Energetics of Gestation and Fetal Growth”.

But I like egg.

But even energy and metabolism might not be the full answer.

It could be that how helpless our babies are when they are born has had a big influence

on what happens after they are born.

How self-sufficient an animal's young are at birth can be determined by a lot of things.

If they have to run from predators, if their parents are quickly on the move, or if their

egg had enough nutrients to hatch big.

But having helpless babies, and helping them get smarter, might've forced ancient human

parents to get smarter too.

It's a pretty cool theory.

It works like this:

When we look at human ancestors, it's clear that natural selection favored humans with

larger brains, because they tended to be smarter.

But human babies' brains are already born as big as they can be because of the whole

energy thing, so the only way to make a bigger brain is for the brain to spend more time

growing after you're born.

That requires longer parental care, which requires more intelligent parents, which over

time selects for parents with bigger brains.

It's a feedback loop.

The more intelligent the parents, the better and longer they can care for a helpless baby,

and the bigger the baby's brain can eventually grow.

Research tells us that modern human brains don't finish developing until about age

25, which means I have been past my peak for a while, but it supports this idea that intelligent

parents caring for their children for longer have helped extend the amount of time our

brains get to grow before they're done.

More intelligence probably made early human ancestors more social too, which made raising

helpless young even easier, which would start a whole other feedback loop making us more

and more social over time.

These aren't the kinds of things that you'd notice in a generation or two.

They'd evolve across hundreds of generations.

There are definitely other reasons that our ancestors' brains grew.

Making tools and hunting animals?

That helped a lot.

Harnessing fire and cooking food to get more calories and nutrients helped too.

But ask any parent: It is not easy to raise a helpless baby, especially for a decade or

two like humans do.

It takes our unique intelligence, and our unique social abilities to do it.

I mean, you give a human baby to a group of chimpanzees, it's not gonna end well.

In the end, like all interesting and complex human traits, our extreme intelligence and

our babies' relative lack thereof can't be explained by just one reason.

It's a mix of many reasons.

Having a baby is not an easy thing to do.

But the very fact that humans are so good at having more humans, and caring for them

and each other as deeply and for as long as we do, is proof enough that we are a very

special species indeed.

Stay curious.

Thanks for watching this video guys, I hope you enjoyed it.

It made me think.

You know what else takes a lot of nurturing and care?

A YouTube channel!

I want to thank everyone who supports the show on Patreon for helping take care of us.

Head on over to our Patreon page, you can check out all the great perks we have like

opportunities to chat and hang out with me, awesome behind the scenes content, you might

even get to vote on future episode topics.

Just check out the link down in the description or click the little thing at the end of the

video.

And one more thing!

You should check out "Antarctic Extremes", it's a new miniseries from NOVA and PBS Digital

Studios.

This is a journey to Earth's most remote laboratory: Antarctica, where science and survival meet

head to head.

Hosts Caitlin Saks and Arlo Perez are revealing a world that's sometimes harsh, sometimes

hilarious, sometimes gross.

But always thrilling and very cold.

Find Antarctic Extremes on PBS Terra, which is PBS Digital Studios' newest science channel.

Check out the episode in the description below and tell them that I sent you.

A train leaves Denver traveling 40 miles… you don't know what a train is.

Draw a picture.

That is inappropriate sir.

Given the following distribution of probabilities, in fact, just play with that one.

You've been great.

It's fine.

You know crows can solve this one.

No offense or anything.

You 're cuter than a crow.

What is the best bird?

Name a bird.

Name an animal.

Who are you?

This is just a simple filming release.

Just allows us to use this, just make your mark.

Ok.

And thank you!

That's great.

We look forward to working with you again!

There's cookies in the lobby! [baby crying]

Humans Are Smart. Why Are Babies So Unsmart? Der Mensch ist klug. Warum sind Babys so unintelligent? Los humanos somos inteligentes. ¿Por qué los bebés son tan poco inteligentes? 人間は賢い。なぜ赤ちゃんは賢くないのか? Mensen zijn slim. Waarom zijn baby's zo onslim? Os humanos são inteligentes. Porque é que os bebés são tão pouco inteligentes? Люди умны. Почему дети такие неумные? Människor är smarta. Varför är bebisar så osmarta? İnsanlar Akıllıdır. Bebekler Neden Bu Kadar Zeki Değil? 人类很聪明。为什么婴儿这么不聪明? 人類很聰明。為什麼嬰兒這麼不聰明?

Subject A dash 34, neonatal intelligence battery. Sujeto A guión 34, batería de inteligencia neonatal. Тема A dash 34, неонатальна батарея інтелекту.

Trial 17, hour 4, let's just get on with this.

Ok, solve for… solve for X.

Looking for more… numbers.

We'll just, I'm gonna, we'll get back to that one later. Ми просто, я збираюся, ми повернемося до цього пізніше.

Ok, I'm just going to start my watch. Ok, voy a poner en marcha mi reloj. Гаразд, я просто заведу свій годинник.

[bang bang bang] Unorthodox.

[banging and baby noises] It is challenging. [стукіт і дитячі звуки] Це складно.

[banging] We're at 47 minutes. [гуркіт] Ми на 47 хвилині.

Oh, well if that's how you're gonna play then fine. Ну, якщо ти збираєшся так грати, то добре.

What is the relationship between these two objects? Який зв’язок між цими двома об’єктами?

[baby noises] I think he's gonna get this one!

And he's eating it.

You can't cheat. Не можна обманювати.

Marks off for that. Por eso, se le quitan puntos.

Ok this… ahhhhh.

Can you spell… Ви можете написати...

Can you spell pituit- Can you spell P? Kun je pituit spellen - Kun je P spellen?

That is incorrect.

Hey Smart People, Joe here.

The first thing a baby giraffe experiences after being born is a 2 meter fall straight

down to the ground. hasta el suelo.

But within an hour, it's standing, walking, and nursing on its own. Pero al cabo de una hora, ya se pone de pie, camina y mama solo. Maar binnen een uur staat, loopt en verzorgt hij zelfstandig.

And a blue whale calf, after nearly a year growing inside mom, can swim to the surface Y una cría de ballena azul, tras casi un año creciendo dentro de mamá, puede nadar hasta la superficie

moments after being born.

Human babies on the other hand?

We're born unable to move or eat on our own, we can't communicate or fully sense

our world, and we leak. nuestro mundo, y nos filtramos.

Everywhere.

If humans are so smart, why are our babies so… un-smart?

Human babies begin life so undeveloped, that many people refer to a baby's first few Людські немовлята починають життя настільки нерозвиненими, що багато людей називають перші кілька немовлят

months of life as the fourth trimester. місяців життя як четвертий триместр.

Compared to other animals, we lie on the “altricial” end of the spectrum. In vergelijking met andere dieren liggen we aan de "altriciale" kant van het spectrum. Порівняно з іншими тваринами, ми знаходимося на «страшному» кінці спектра.

Compare that with, say, a baby cow, a precocial animal, whose brain and body is developed Vergelijk dat eens met, laten we zeggen, een babykoe, een precociaal dier, wiens hersenen en lichaam ontwikkeld zijn

enough that they can stand and run just moments after being born.

Tiny humans require a ton of parental care before we're ready to be on our own.

Our parents not only grow us for 9 months or so, they carry us, they feed us, they keep

us from dying, and teach us how to provide for ourselves for 15, 18 years… heck these

days even over 30 isn't unheard of.

It's actually totally normal.

Ma!

I'm shooting a video down here!

Gah!

Have to start over, edit this.

That's because, well, our brains come out half-cooked at best. Це тому, що наш мозок у кращому випадку виходить напівприготованим.

When we're born our brain is around 30% the size of our adult brain.

That's the smallest of all of our primate relatives. Це найменший з усіх наших родичів-приматів.

Why does our smart species have such small-brained babies? Чому наш розумний вид має такі маломозкі діти?

For a long time, scientists' best answer to that question was the obstetric dilemma. Довгий час найкращою відповіддю вчених на це запитання була акушерська дилема.

Basically, our brains come out as big as they physically can be.

The obstetric dilemma goes like this: if our brains were any bigger at birth, they wouldn't

fit out the birth canal.

And if female pelvises were any wider, they would make walking and running less efficient…

which might not affect your life that much, but would've made it easier for our ancestors

to become dinner… which means no babies, which means no you or me.

So here, natural selection found a compromise: mom's pelvis stays narrow enough to walk

and run, and babies are born earlier so their noggins don't get stuck. en rennen, en baby's worden eerder geboren, zodat hun noggin niet vast komt te zitten.

It's a pretty logical idea.

But it doesn't hold water.

Male and female bodies do have significant anatomical differences, but research has found

that wider or roomier pelvises don't make walking and running, AKA “locomotion” dat bredere of ruimere bekkens niet maken lopen en rennen, AKA "beweging" що ширший або просторіший таз не дозволяє ходити чи бігати, або ж «пересування»

less efficient. менш ефективний.

And, some women already have pelvic openings wide enough to fit bigger heads and brains. Крім того, деякі жінки вже мають тазові отвори достатньо широкі, щоб у них містилася велика голова та мозок.

Not every woman does, but if there was strong pressure from natural selection for roomier Не кожна жінка так, але якщо був сильний тиск природного відбору на просторіше

pelvises, they'd have become more common. тазів, вони стали б більш поширеними.

So pelvis size isn't why our babies come out half-baked.

The real answer might have more to do with metabolism.

The bigger a developing baby gets, the more it demands from mom.

I mean, women grow a completely new organ, the placenta, not to mention a complete human

being, inside their bodies, and that takes energy!

It might be that mom's ability to provide enough energy for growing baby determines Можливо, це визначає здатність мами забезпечити достатньо енергії для росту дитини

when baby is born.

Humans and all other animals have what's called a basal metabolic rate. Люди та всі інші тварини мають так звану базову швидкість метаболізму.

It's how much energy we burn when we're not doing anything else.

A Tour de France cyclist at peak human performance can hit maybe four or five times their base

metabolism.

But most of us normal humans?

We max out at around two times our basal rate. We bereiken een maximum van ongeveer twee keer onze basale snelheid.

We just can't run our biological engines any higher for very long. Ми просто не можемо працювати з нашими біологічними двигунами дуже довго.

Like overclocking a CPU, there's just a physical limit to how much extra energy we Net als het overklokken van een CPU, is er slechts een fysieke limiet aan hoeveel extra energie we hebben

can create.

For the last third of pregnancy, and even into nursing, a mother is at the limit, burning

twice as much energy as before baby.

Nine months happens to be right about the time a growing baby starts to demand more

energy than mom can provide, so it's born.

It's called the EGG hypothesis, or “Energetics of Gestation and Fetal Growth”.

But I like egg.

But even energy and metabolism might not be the full answer.

It could be that how helpless our babies are when they are born has had a big influence

on what happens after they are born.

How self-sufficient an animal's young are at birth can be determined by a lot of things. Наскільки самодостатні дитинчата тварини при народженні, можна визначити багатьма факторами.

If they have to run from predators, if their parents are quickly on the move, or if their

egg had enough nutrients to hatch big.

But having helpless babies, and helping them get smarter, might've forced ancient human

parents to get smarter too.

It's a pretty cool theory.

It works like this:

When we look at human ancestors, it's clear that natural selection favored humans with

larger brains, because they tended to be smarter.

But human babies' brains are already born as big as they can be because of the whole Але мозок людських немовлят уже народжується настільки великим, наскільки вони можуть бути завдяки цілому

energy thing, so the only way to make a bigger brain is for the brain to spend more time енергією, тож єдиний спосіб зробити мозок більшим – це витрачати більше часу

growing after you're born. росте після вашого народження.

That requires longer parental care, which requires more intelligent parents, which over Що вимагає довшої батьківської турботи, що вимагає більш розумних батьків, що закінчилося

time selects for parents with bigger brains. час вибирає для батьків з більшим мізком.

It's a feedback loop.

The more intelligent the parents, the better and longer they can care for a helpless baby,

and the bigger the baby's brain can eventually grow.

Research tells us that modern human brains don't finish developing until about age

25, which means I have been past my peak for a while, but it supports this idea that intelligent 25, що означає, що я на деякий час пройшов свій пік, але це підтверджує думку про те, що розумний

parents caring for their children for longer have helped extend the amount of time our батьки, які довше піклуються про своїх дітей, допомогли нам збільшити час

brains get to grow before they're done.

More intelligence probably made early human ancestors more social too, which made raising

helpless young even easier, which would start a whole other feedback loop making us more

and more social over time.

These aren't the kinds of things that you'd notice in a generation or two. Це не ті речі, які ви помітите через покоління чи два.

They'd evolve across hundreds of generations.

There are definitely other reasons that our ancestors' brains grew.

Making tools and hunting animals?

That helped a lot.

Harnessing fire and cooking food to get more calories and nutrients helped too.

But ask any parent: It is not easy to raise a helpless baby, especially for a decade or

two like humans do.

It takes our unique intelligence, and our unique social abilities to do it.

I mean, you give a human baby to a group of chimpanzees, it's not gonna end well.

In the end, like all interesting and complex human traits, our extreme intelligence and

our babies' relative lack thereof can't be explained by just one reason. Відносну відсутність у наших дітей не можна пояснити лише однією причиною.

It's a mix of many reasons.

Having a baby is not an easy thing to do.

But the very fact that humans are so good at having more humans, and caring for them

and each other as deeply and for as long as we do, is proof enough that we are a very

special species indeed.

Stay curious. Залишайтеся цікавими.

Thanks for watching this video guys, I hope you enjoyed it.

It made me think.

You know what else takes a lot of nurturing and care?

A YouTube channel!

I want to thank everyone who supports the show on Patreon for helping take care of us.

Head on over to our Patreon page, you can check out all the great perks we have like

opportunities to chat and hang out with me, awesome behind the scenes content, you might

even get to vote on future episode topics.

Just check out the link down in the description or click the little thing at the end of the

video.

And one more thing!

You should check out "Antarctic Extremes", it's a new miniseries from NOVA and PBS Digital

Studios.

This is a journey to Earth's most remote laboratory: Antarctica, where science and survival meet

head to head.

Hosts Caitlin Saks and Arlo Perez are revealing a world that's sometimes harsh, sometimes Ведучі Кейтлін Сакс і Арло Перес розкривають світ, який інколи буває суворим, а інколи

hilarious, sometimes gross. смішний, іноді огидний.

But always thrilling and very cold. Але завжди хвилююче і дуже холодно.

Find Antarctic Extremes on PBS Terra, which is PBS Digital Studios' newest science channel.

Check out the episode in the description below and tell them that I sent you.

A train leaves Denver traveling 40 miles… you don't know what a train is.

Draw a picture.

That is inappropriate sir.

Given the following distribution of probabilities, in fact, just play with that one. Враховуючи наступний розподіл ймовірностей, просто пограйте з цим.

You've been great.

It's fine.

You know crows can solve this one.

No offense or anything.

You 're cuter than a crow.

What is the best bird?

Name a bird.

Name an animal.

Who are you?

This is just a simple filming release.

Just allows us to use this, just make your mark. Просто дозволяє нам використовувати це, просто залишити свій слід.

Ok.

And thank you!

That's great.

We look forward to working with you again!

There's cookies in the lobby! [baby crying]