×

Usamos cookies para ayudar a mejorar LingQ. Al visitar este sitio, aceptas nuestras politicas de cookie.


image

The Making of Modern Ukraine, Class 8. Early Jews of Modern Ukraine (3)

Class 8. Early Jews of Modern Ukraine (3)

and they start to develop

these extensive instruments of autonomy

to the point where

when there are disputes between communities,

they develop regional councils,

and then, a real game changer

is when the crown basically says,

"Okay, we just want a lump sum from you," you know?

"Forget about the individual communities collecting taxes.

"Give us one lump sum,"

and then the Grand Duchy of Lithuania says the same thing,

and that's when developing out of that

is the Council of Four Lands,

which is kind of like functioning

as not just a supreme IRS, a supreme tax collector,

but a supreme court

that's adjudicating disputes between communities,

that deals with, really, you call them national problems,

a blood libel accusation, a ritual murder accusation,

the accusation that Jews have killed a Christian child

and used their blood for their,

used the blood for their rituals,

which never happened, I should emphasize,

but it was kind of like the rumor that refused to go away

because it symbolically reenacts the crucifixion,

and it has a lot of resonance that way,

so, you know, this Council of Four Lands

would have somebody intervene

and try to prevent, you know,

this thing from getting out of control.

They would negotiate the taxes,

and they would serve as a supreme court in secular matters.

Now, each kahal also had a rabbinical court,

so the entire Jewish community is known as the kehila.

It's run by the kahal,

but they also have rabbis

who are sort of separate from everything.

That Council of Four Lands is mainly merchants,

is mainly wealthy merchants and leaseholders, okay?

The rabbis meet separately,

and they tend to judge religious matters,

which makes a lot of sense

until you try to figure out what a religious matter is.

It's not so clear.

Murder seems to be a religious matter.

Theft, kind of, but it's also a business matter,

so there's a lot of, like, jurisdictional disputes going on

between rabbinical courts and lay courts,

but by and large, you know,

when things are functioning smoothly,

they support each other,

and there's a actual power

to excommunicate members

that's never really used,

but the threat of excommunication, called the herem,

is enough to scare people

into obeying the authority of these various courts

because being excommunicated would really be truly horrible.

You know, you would really have no place to go

in Christian society, in Jewish society,

and it's like social death,

and a really devastating condition to be in.

It's never used

until the rise of the false messianic movement

of Shabbetai Tzvi, which happens later on.

We'll maybe touch upon at the very end.

Now, a shtadlan is a very important function.

The shtadlan is a lobbyist,

and every community would have one.

He speaks the language of the land.

He knows the laws really well.

He's charming

and has somewhat of a secular education,

so a lot of times doctors would serve this purpose,

and he basically is the go-between.

You know, he'll talk to the authorities

when something goes wrong,

and this is kind of like,

you know, Jewish foreign policy, you could call it.

You know, this is how they defend their communities,

through lobbying, yes, through giving of bribes.

I mean, this was actually totally on the books,

out in the open.

It was a normal way of doing business.

You bribed the secular officials to protect your community,

and no one seemed to see anything wrong with that.

Now, with this extensive autonomy,

really, the most extensive autonomy since antiquity,

you also have the development of vibrant religious life

and the wooden synagogues.

Here's one in Khodoriv in the Ukrainian territories.

They can develop very ornate, beautiful artwork

even though they're wooden synagogues,

which suggests less wealth.

Beautiful ceiling paintings.

Down in the corner there, I put an image of this guy,

who's chained to the synagogue wall outside

by his neck.

Any idea what he did wrong?

He broke the Sabbath,

so this is actually called the kuna,

and I put it there to remind us not to get too nostalgic

about this flourishing religious life

'cause there's a lot of religious compulsion involved too.

You know, keeping the Sabbath was not a choice,

at least not throughout this period of time,

and if you go to the town of Czestochowa in Poland,

you can actually see one of these on the synagogue wall.

It's pretty interesting.

Most people could pay a fine and get out of it, you know,

and they would prefer to pay the fine

than be publicly humiliated in this way,

but it was there.

Now, Jews are able to move into cities,

but again, you come into direct conflict

with the Christian townspeople,

and economics is something that's perceived

in an ethnic way, right?

There are groups against groups, Christians against Jews,

and the Christians manage to exact

a lot of money and payment from Jewish merchants,

so it becomes very expensive to do business in cities,

and that's where your leaseholding comes in,

and the official word for lease is arenda.

You may see it in your readings.

The arenda can be a lease on everything we've talked about

and some things we didn't talk about: tolls on roads, ponds.

You can lease the tax,

and then you get to keep anything

over the amount that you collect.

You can lease entire villages, taverns, and distilleries.

This is an absolute boon

to Jews, economically,

but let's just say it's not good to be a serf

in this situation,

and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth comes to be known,

as I don't know if you've heard this before,

heaven for the nobles, paradise for the Jews,

and hell for the serfs.

The reason is this is an arrangement

that is not only economically debilitating for the serfs

who have to continually work,

you know, the nobleman's land for free

along with whatever land they're able to work of their own,

which is very small.

They have to, you know,

pay the Jewish tavernkeeper.

They have to pay the Jewish miller.

There are even rumors that Jews lease the churches

and held keys to the churches,

which would be really humiliating,

but some historians have said that's actually not the case,

but that is something

that made its way up through Ukrainian lore

is that you even had to beg to use your own church,

you know, so it's a really humiliating situation,

whether that last thing is true or not,

and that's the reason for the volatility,

but nobody's going to attack the Jewish leaseholder

for the simple reason

that he's under the protection of the nobleman.

Nobles own the vast majority of land.

They're increasingly more powerful than the king,

who becomes an elected monarch,

and they really, I would say,

they own their own towns,

and those are increasingly attractive to Jews to settle in.

It's a system of patronage, really.

Now, inside the tavern,

you have that integration that I was talking about,

but it's really more of an interaction,

and here you have Jewish musicians,

non-Jews who are dancing,

and you have the Jewish tavernkeepers over on that side,

and notice that the wife of the tavernkeeper

is pouring the liquor.

I'm not sure whose child that is in the corner there,

but children were very much present

in these taverns as well.

This was where people would spend their leisure time.

These were also, effectively, news venues,

entertainment venues, banks, country stores,

especially in the smaller,

you know, rural areas or small towns.

They were the hub of everything,

competing, really, with the church,

you know, because after the wedding,

you would, you know, proceed from the church to the tavern,

where you'd be met by the tavernkeeper,

who's kind of like the antipriest,

but what I want to emphasize is gender

because women worked in the society, in Jewish society,

and it was expected.

It wasn't something that women fought for as a right.

It was absolutely expected.

Your value on the marriage market was determined

by what business promise you could bring to the marriage.

That would often be linguistic,

like, how well you speak Polish or Ukrainian or whatever,

how well you know arithmetic,

and these marriages were really business partnerships.

Usually, the husband would be dealing with the suppliers.

He might drive a taxi,

you know, a horse and cart during the week.

The woman would be, the wife would be serving the customers,

and it's a pretty rough lifestyle,

but why that's important is

the Jewish familial unit

presents a kind of double-barrel threat economically

because both the husband and wife are working,

and this is absolutely the norm.

Occasionally, you have the situation

where an extremely learned and accomplished rabbi

would study all day long

and the wife would work in the marketplace

or in the tavern, whatever,

but that was a pretty rare occurrence, okay.

Now, one arenda dispute

that I went through pretty extensively

illustrates the problem with authority,

the way things stand,

and the importance of the development

of the Council of Four Lands, that supreme court.

I just wanna go through this really quickly

because what happens in this situation of leases,

and this is probably a tavern that's being leased,

is competition between Jews, okay?

In this case, Simeon leases a liquor arenda.

Reuben attempts to purchase it for the next three years

before his term is up, so he's the encroacher,

and then, Simeon goes and negotiates

with the local nobleman, successfully, who gives it to him.

Reuben, in this case, goes all the way to the queen

and gets her scribe to support his side,

and he tells the town council to award the lease to Reuben.

The towns council agree,

town council agrees, but for a bribe.

Reuben pays the bribe.

Simeon bribes the nobleman,

so lots of bribes going on here,

and offers an even higher price,

and the nobleman orders the town council

to withdraw it from Reuben,

and then the queen steps in and supports Reuben,

so you have, like,

these conflicting secular authorities that get involved,

which leads me to think it's much more than a tavern.

It could be, you know, an entire right to distill,

which is called (speaks in foreign language),

but it's something that is pretty lucrative,

so they actually don't stop with the authorities,

not even the queen.

They now go to the rabbis,

and the rabbis are extremely prominent in this society,

which is a, you know, community of believers.

Some of these rabbis have their own yeshivas,

these Talmudic academies,

where they teach the Talmud all day long,

but when disputes occur

that have to do with some aspect of Jewish law, halakha,

they will often send questions to the most prominent rabbis,

and this is what happens in this case,

so Rabbi Isaac Ben Bezalel of Volodymyr,

he argues in favor of Simeon,

and he quotes a medieval German source

to basically say, "Do not encroach," okay?

So he's basically anti-Reuben, anti-encroachment,

but then they go to a more prominent rabbi,

Isaac Luria, who's young, but he's kind of a rising star,

and he actually rules in favor of Reuben

and says that the laws of encroachment don't apply

'cause this is only a potential purchase, right?

The lease term hadn't begun yet, so it's a potential,

it's like the next three years of the term,

and he says, "It's known in the entire kingdom

"that we buy the right to farm taxes and liquor

"and other rights in the town with an arenda contract,"

and they're also accustomed to sell the arenda

before the term for the first holder of the arenda expires,

and they sell it to a second person, so Reuben's okay.

He's allowed to encroach, okay?

Now, Luria's young.

He may be brilliant and a rising star, but he's young,


Class 8. Early Jews of Modern Ukraine (3) Klas 8. Vroege Joden in het moderne Oekraïne (3) Aula 8. Judeus primitivos da Ucrânia moderna (3) Занятие 8. Ранние евреи современной Украины (3)

and they start to develop

these extensive instruments of autonomy

to the point where

when there are disputes between communities,

they develop regional councils,

and then, a real game changer

is when the crown basically says,

"Okay, we just want a lump sum from you," you know?

"Forget about the individual communities collecting taxes.

"Give us one lump sum,"

and then the Grand Duchy of Lithuania says the same thing,

and that's when developing out of that

is the Council of Four Lands,

which is kind of like functioning

as not just a supreme IRS, a supreme tax collector,

but a supreme court

that's adjudicating disputes between communities,

that deals with, really, you call them national problems,

a blood libel accusation, a ritual murder accusation,

the accusation that Jews have killed a Christian child

and used their blood for their,

used the blood for their rituals,

which never happened, I should emphasize,

but it was kind of like the rumor that refused to go away

because it symbolically reenacts the crucifixion,

and it has a lot of resonance that way,

so, you know, this Council of Four Lands

would have somebody intervene

and try to prevent, you know,

this thing from getting out of control.

They would negotiate the taxes,

and they would serve as a supreme court in secular matters.

Now, each kahal also had a rabbinical court,

so the entire Jewish community is known as the kehila. so the entire Jewish community is known as the kehila.

It's run by the kahal,

but they also have rabbis but they also have rabbis

who are sort of separate from everything.

That Council of Four Lands is mainly merchants,

is mainly wealthy merchants and leaseholders, okay?

The rabbis meet separately,

and they tend to judge religious matters,

which makes a lot of sense

until you try to figure out what a religious matter is.

It's not so clear.

Murder seems to be a religious matter.

Theft, kind of, but it's also a business matter,

so there's a lot of, like, jurisdictional disputes going on

between rabbinical courts and lay courts,

but by and large, you know,

when things are functioning smoothly,

they support each other,

and there's a actual power

to excommunicate members

that's never really used,

but the threat of excommunication, called the herem,

is enough to scare people

into obeying the authority of these various courts

because being excommunicated would really be truly horrible.

You know, you would really have no place to go

in Christian society, in Jewish society,

and it's like social death,

and a really devastating condition to be in.

It's never used

until the rise of the false messianic movement

of Shabbetai Tzvi, which happens later on.

We'll maybe touch upon at the very end.

Now, a shtadlan is a very important function.

The shtadlan is a lobbyist,

and every community would have one.

He speaks the language of the land.

He knows the laws really well.

He's charming

and has somewhat of a secular education,

so a lot of times doctors would serve this purpose,

and he basically is the go-between.

You know, he'll talk to the authorities

when something goes wrong,

and this is kind of like,

you know, Jewish foreign policy, you could call it.

You know, this is how they defend their communities,

through lobbying, yes, through giving of bribes.

I mean, this was actually totally on the books, Ich meine, das war eigentlich völlig legal,

out in the open.

It was a normal way of doing business.

You bribed the secular officials to protect your community, 你贿赂世俗官员来保护你的社区,

and no one seemed to see anything wrong with that.

Now, with this extensive autonomy,

really, the most extensive autonomy since antiquity,

you also have the development of vibrant religious life

and the wooden synagogues.

Here's one in Khodoriv in the Ukrainian territories.

They can develop very ornate, beautiful artwork

even though they're wooden synagogues,

which suggests less wealth.

Beautiful ceiling paintings.

Down in the corner there, I put an image of this guy,

who's chained to the synagogue wall outside

by his neck.

Any idea what he did wrong?

He broke the Sabbath,

so this is actually called the kuna,

and I put it there to remind us not to get too nostalgic

about this flourishing religious life

'cause there's a lot of religious compulsion involved too.

You know, keeping the Sabbath was not a choice,

at least not throughout this period of time,

and if you go to the town of Czestochowa in Poland,

you can actually see one of these on the synagogue wall.

It's pretty interesting.

Most people could pay a fine and get out of it, you know,

and they would prefer to pay the fine

than be publicly humiliated in this way,

but it was there.

Now, Jews are able to move into cities,

but again, you come into direct conflict

with the Christian townspeople,

and economics is something that's perceived

in an ethnic way, right?

There are groups against groups, Christians against Jews,

and the Christians manage to exact und die Christen schaffen es, die

a lot of money and payment from Jewish merchants,

so it becomes very expensive to do business in cities,

and that's where your leaseholding comes in,

and the official word for lease is arenda.

You may see it in your readings.

The arenda can be a lease on everything we've talked about

and some things we didn't talk about: tolls on roads, ponds.

You can lease the tax,

and then you get to keep anything

over the amount that you collect.

You can lease entire villages, taverns, and distilleries.

This is an absolute boon

to Jews, economically,

but let's just say it's not good to be a serf

in this situation,

and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth comes to be known,

as I don't know if you've heard this before,

heaven for the nobles, paradise for the Jews,

and hell for the serfs.

The reason is this is an arrangement

that is not only economically debilitating for the serfs

who have to continually work,

you know, the nobleman's land for free

along with whatever land they're able to work of their own,

which is very small.

They have to, you know,

pay the Jewish tavernkeeper.

They have to pay the Jewish miller.

There are even rumors that Jews lease the churches

and held keys to the churches,

which would be really humiliating,

but some historians have said that's actually not the case,

but that is something

that made its way up through Ukrainian lore

is that you even had to beg to use your own church,

you know, so it's a really humiliating situation,

whether that last thing is true or not,

and that's the reason for the volatility,

but nobody's going to attack the Jewish leaseholder

for the simple reason

that he's under the protection of the nobleman.

Nobles own the vast majority of land.

They're increasingly more powerful than the king,

who becomes an elected monarch,

and they really, I would say,

they own their own towns,

and those are increasingly attractive to Jews to settle in.

It's a system of patronage, really.

Now, inside the tavern,

you have that integration that I was talking about,

but it's really more of an interaction,

and here you have Jewish musicians,

non-Jews who are dancing,

and you have the Jewish tavernkeepers over on that side,

and notice that the wife of the tavernkeeper

is pouring the liquor.

I'm not sure whose child that is in the corner there,

but children were very much present

in these taverns as well.

This was where people would spend their leisure time.

These were also, effectively, news venues,

entertainment venues, banks, country stores,

especially in the smaller,

you know, rural areas or small towns.

They were the hub of everything,

competing, really, with the church,

you know, because after the wedding,

you would, you know, proceed from the church to the tavern,

where you'd be met by the tavernkeeper,

who's kind of like the antipriest,

but what I want to emphasize is gender

because women worked in the society, in Jewish society,

and it was expected.

It wasn't something that women fought for as a right.

It was absolutely expected.

Your value on the marriage market was determined

by what business promise you could bring to the marriage.

That would often be linguistic,

like, how well you speak Polish or Ukrainian or whatever,

how well you know arithmetic,

and these marriages were really business partnerships.

Usually, the husband would be dealing with the suppliers.

He might drive a taxi,

you know, a horse and cart during the week.

The woman would be, the wife would be serving the customers,

and it's a pretty rough lifestyle,

but why that's important is

the Jewish familial unit

presents a kind of double-barrel threat economically

because both the husband and wife are working,

and this is absolutely the norm.

Occasionally, you have the situation

where an extremely learned and accomplished rabbi

would study all day long

and the wife would work in the marketplace

or in the tavern, whatever,

but that was a pretty rare occurrence, okay.

Now, one arenda dispute

that I went through pretty extensively

illustrates the problem with authority,

the way things stand,

and the importance of the development

of the Council of Four Lands, that supreme court.

I just wanna go through this really quickly

because what happens in this situation of leases,

and this is probably a tavern that's being leased,

is competition between Jews, okay?

In this case, Simeon leases a liquor arenda.

Reuben attempts to purchase it for the next three years

before his term is up, so he's the encroacher, voordat zijn termijn erop zit, dus hij is de indringer,

and then, Simeon goes and negotiates

with the local nobleman, successfully, who gives it to him.

Reuben, in this case, goes all the way to the queen

and gets her scribe to support his side,

and he tells the town council to award the lease to Reuben.

The towns council agree,

town council agrees, but for a bribe.

Reuben pays the bribe.

Simeon bribes the nobleman,

so lots of bribes going on here,

and offers an even higher price,

and the nobleman orders the town council

to withdraw it from Reuben,

and then the queen steps in and supports Reuben,

so you have, like,

these conflicting secular authorities that get involved,

which leads me to think it's much more than a tavern.

It could be, you know, an entire right to distill,

which is called (speaks in foreign language),

but it's something that is pretty lucrative,

so they actually don't stop with the authorities,

not even the queen.

They now go to the rabbis,

and the rabbis are extremely prominent in this society,

which is a, you know, community of believers.

Some of these rabbis have their own yeshivas,

these Talmudic academies,

where they teach the Talmud all day long,

but when disputes occur

that have to do with some aspect of Jewish law, halakha,

they will often send questions to the most prominent rabbis,

and this is what happens in this case,

so Rabbi Isaac Ben Bezalel of Volodymyr,

he argues in favor of Simeon,

and he quotes a medieval German source

to basically say, "Do not encroach," okay?

So he's basically anti-Reuben, anti-encroachment,

but then they go to a more prominent rabbi,

Isaac Luria, who's young, but he's kind of a rising star,

and he actually rules in favor of Reuben

and says that the laws of encroachment don't apply

'cause this is only a potential purchase, right?

The lease term hadn't begun yet, so it's a potential,

it's like the next three years of the term,

and he says, "It's known in the entire kingdom

"that we buy the right to farm taxes and liquor

"and other rights in the town with an arenda contract,"

and they're also accustomed to sell the arenda

before the term for the first holder of the arenda expires,

and they sell it to a second person, so Reuben's okay.

He's allowed to encroach, okay?

Now, Luria's young.

He may be brilliant and a rising star, but he's young,