Mesopotamia: Crash Course World History #3

Hi there. I'm John Green, you're watching Crash Course World History, and today we're

going to talk about "Iraq" No, you purportedly smart globe. We're going to talk about Mesopotamia.

I love Mesopotamia because it helped create two of my favorite things: Writing and taxes.

Why do I like taxes? Because before taxes, the only certainty was death.

Mr. Green. Mr. Green, did you know that you're referencing Mark Twain?

I'm not referencing Mark Twain, me from the past, I'm referencing Benjamin Franklin,

who was probably himself quoting the unfortunately named playwright Christopher Bullock. Listen.

You may be smart, kid, but I've been smart longer. By the way, today's illustration

points out that an eye for an eye leaves the whole world monocular.

[theme music]

So 5,000 years ago in the land meso, or between, the Tigris and Euphrates potomoi, or rivers,

cities started popping up much like they had in our old friend the Indus River valley.

These early Mesopotamian cities engaged in a form of socialism, where farmers contributed

their crops to public storehouses out of which workers, like metalworkers or builders or

male models or whatever—would be paid uniform "wages" in grain. So, basically—

MR GREEN MR GREEN WERE THERE REALLY MALE MODELS? CAN YOU DO BLUE STEEL?

Oh younger version of myself, how I hate you.

Oh the humiliation I suffer for you people... that was my best Blue Steel.

That was as close as I can get.

So anyway, if you lived in a city, you could be something other than a shepherd, and thanks

to this proto-socialism you could be reasonably sure that you'd eat--

STAN, Is there any way we could get another globe in here? I feel like this shot is inadequately

globed. Yes, much better.

You know you can tell the quality of the historian by the number of his or her globes.

But even though you could give up your flock, a lot of people didn't want to.

One of the legacies of Mesopotamia is the enduring conflict between country and city.

You see this explored a lot in some of our greatest art such as

The Beverly Hillbillies and Deliverance, and the showdown between Enkidu and Gilgamesh

in the Epic of Gilgamesh. Gilgamesh is one of the oldest known works of literature and

I'm not gonna spoil it for you— there's a link to the poem in the video

info—but suffice it to say that in the showdown between country and city, the city wins.

So what were these city states like? Well, let's take a look at one such city-state,

Gilgamesh's home town of Uruk, in the Thought Bubble:

Uruk was a walled city with an extensive canal system and several monumental temples, called ziggurats.

The priests of these temples initially had all the power, because they were able to communicate

directly with the gods.

That was a useful talent, because Mesopotamian gods were moody and frankly pretty mean—like,

according to Gilgamesh they once got mad at us because we were making too much noise while

they were trying to sleep so they decided to destroy all of humanity with a flood.

The Tigris and Euphrates are decent as rivers go, but Mesopotamia is no Indus Valley, with

its on-schedule flooding and easy irrigation.

A lot of slave labor was needed to make the Tigris and Euphrates useful for irrigation;

they're difficult to navigate and flood unpredictably and violently. Violent, unpredictable,

and difficult to navigate: Oh, Tigris and Euphrates, how you remind me of my college girlfriend.

So I mean given that the region tends to yo-yo between devastating flood and horrible drought,

it follows that one would believe that the gods are kind of random and capricious, and

that any priests who might be able to lead rituals that placate those gods would be very useful individuals.

But about 1000 years after the first temples we find in cities like Uruk, a rival structure

begins to show up, the palace.

The responsibility for the well-being and success of the social order was shifting from gods

to people, a power shift that will seesaw throughout human history until...um, probably forever actually.

But in another development we'll see again, these kings, who probably started out as military

leaders or really rich landowners, took on a quasi-religious role.

How? Often by engaging in "sacred marriage" -- specifically skoodilypooping with the

high priestess of the city's temple.

So the priests were overtaken by kings, who soon declared themselves priests.

Thanks, Thought Bubble. So how do we know that these kings were skoodilypooping with

lady priests? Because they made a skoodilypooping tape and put it on the internet. No, because

there's a written record. Mesopotamia gave us writing, specifically a form of writing

called cuneiform, which was initially created not to like woo lovers or whatever but to

record transactions like how many bushels of wheat were exchanged for how many goats.

I'm not kidding, by the way; a lot of cuneiform is about wheat and goats.

I don't think you can overestimate the importance of writing but let's just make three points here:

1. Writing and reading are things that not everyone can do. So they create a class distinction, one that in fact survives to this day. Foraging social orders were relatively egalitarian;

but the Mesopotamians had slaves and they played this metaphorically resonant sport

that was like polo except instead of riding on horses you rode on other people.

And written language played an important role in widening the gap between classes.

2. Once writing enters the picture, you have actual history instead of just a lot of guesswork & archaeology. 3. Without writing, I would not have a job, so I'd like to personally thank Mesopotamia for making it possible for me to work while reclining in my lay-z-boy.

So why did this writing happen in Mesopotamia? Well the fertile crescent, while it is fertile,

is lacking the pretty much everything else. In order to get metal for tools or stone for

sculptures or wood for burning, Mesopotamia had to trade. This trading eventually led

Mesopotamia to develop the world's first territorial kingdom, which will become very

important and will eventually culminate in some extraordinarily inbred Hapsburgs.

So the city state period in Mesopotamia ended around 2,000 BCE, probably because drought

and a shift in the course of rivers led to pastoral nomads coming in and conquering the

environmentally weakened cities. And then the nomads settled into cities of their own

as nomads almost always will unless—wait for it—

...You are the Mongols.

These new Mesopotamian city states were similar to their predecessors in that they had temples

and writing and their own self-glorifying stories but they were different in some important ways.

First, that early proto-socialism was replaced by something that looked a lot like private

enterprise, where people could produce as much as they would like as long as they gave

a cut, also known as taxes to the government. We talk a lot of smack about taxes but it

turns out they're pretty important to creating stable social orders.

Things were also different politically because the dudes who'd been the tribal chiefs became

like full-blown kings, who tried to extend their power outside of cities and also tried

to pass on their power to their sons.

The most famous of these early monarchs is Hammurabi or as I remember him from my high

school history class, "The Hammer of Abi". Hammurabi ruled the new kingdom of Babylon

from 1792 BCE to 1750 BCE.

Hammurabi's main claim to fame is his famous law code which established everything from like

the wages of ox drivers to the fact that the punishment for taking an eye should be having an eye taken.

Hammurabi's law code could be pretty insanely harsh. Like if a builder builds a shoddy building

and then the owner's son dies in a collapse, the punishment for that is the execution of

the builder's son. The kid's like, that's not fair! I'm just a kid. What did I do? You should kill my dad.

All of which is to say that Hammurabi's law code gives a new meaning to the phrase

tough on crime, but it did introduce the presumption of innocence. And in

the law code Hammurabi tried to portray himself in two roles that should sound familiar: shepherd and father.

"[I am] the shepherd who brings peace. My benevolent shade was spread over the city,

I held the peoples of Sumer and Akkad safely on my lap."

So again we see the authority for protection of the social order shifting to men, not gods,

which is important, but don't worry, it'll shift back.

Even though the territorial kingdoms like Babylon were more powerful than any cities

that had come before, and even though Babylon was probably the world's most populous city

during Hammurabi's rule, it wasn't actually that powerful, and keeping with the pattern

it was soon taken over by the formerly-nomadic Kassites.

The thing about Territorial kingdoms is that they relied on the poorest people to pay taxes,

and provide labor and serve in the army, all of which made you not like your king very

much so if you saw any nomadic invaders coming by you might just be like "Hey nomadic invaders!

Come on in; you seem better than the last guy."

Well, that was the case until the Assyrians came along, anyway. The Assyrians have a deserved

reputation for being the brutal bullies of Mesopotamia. But the Assyrians did give us an

early example of probably the most important and durable form of political organization

in world history, and also Star Wars history, the Empire.

The biggest problem with empires is that by definition

they're diverse and multi-ethnic, which makes them hard to unify.

So beginning around 911 BCE, the neo-Assyrian Empire grew from its hometowns of Ashur and

Nineveh to include the whole of Mesopotamia, the Eastern Coast of the Mediterranean and

even, by 680 BCE, Egypt! They did this thanks to the most brutal, terrifying

and efficient army the world had ever seen. More adjectives describing my college girlfriend.

For one thing the army was a meritocracy. Generals weren't chosen based on who their

dads were, they were chosen based on if they were good at Generalling.

Stan, is generalling a word? [pauses, two thumbs up w answer] It is!

Also, they were super mean. Like they would deport hundreds of thousands of people to

separate them from their history and their familes and also moved skilled workers around

where they were most needed.Also the neo-Assyrians loved to find would-be rebels and lop off

their appendages. Particularly their noses for some reason. And there was your standard

raping and pillaging and torture, all of which was done in the name of Ashur, the great god

of the neo-Assyrians whose divine regent was the King.

Ashur, through the King, kept the world going, and as long as conquest continued the world

would not end. But if conquest ever stopped, the world would end and there would be rivers

of blood and weeping and gnashing of teeth. You know how apocalypses go.

The Assyrians spread this world view with propaganda like monumental architecture and

readings about how awesome the king was at public festivals, all of which were designed

to inspire awe in the Empire's subjects.

Oh that reminds me, ITS TIME FOR THE OPEN LETTER.

An Open Letter to the Word Awesome:

But first lets see what's in the Secret Compartment today. Oh, Stan is

this yellow cake uranium? You never find that in Mesopotamia...

Dear Awesome, I love you. Like most contemporary English speakers in fact, I probably love you a little

too much. The thing about you, awesome, is that awesome is just so awesomely awesome at being

awesome. So we lose track of what you really mean, awesome: You're not just cool, you're

terrifying and wonderful. You're knees-buckling, chest-tightening, fearful encounters with

something radically other- something that we know could both crush and bless us. That

is awe, and I apologize for having watered you down.

But seriously, you're awesome.

Best wishes, John Green

So what happened to the Assyrians? Well, first they extended their empire beyond their roads,

making administration impossible.

But maybe even more importantly, when your whole world view is based on the idea that

the apocalypse will come if you ever lose a battle, and then you lose one battle, the

whole world view just blows up. That eventually happened and in 612 BCE, the city of Nineveh

was finally conquered, and the neo-Assyrian Empire had come to its end.

But the idea of Empire was just getting started. Next week we'll talk about mummies — oh,

I have to talk about other things too? Crap, I only want to talk about mummies. Anyway,

we'll be talking about [tapping stylus to talking globe replying Sudan] No! Dangit!

We'll actually be talking about [taps globe to reply Egypt] Thank you, Smart Globe.

See you next week.

Today's episode of Crash Course was produced and directed by Stan Muller. Our Script supervisor is Danica

Johnson. The show is written by my high school history teacher Raoul Meyer with some help from myself.

and our graphics team is Thought Bubble.

Last week's phrase of the week was "Better Boyfriend." If you want to take a guess

at this week's phrase of the week, you can do so in Comments where you can also suggest

new phrases of the week.

And if you have any questions about today's show, leave them in Comments and our team

of semi-professional quasi-historians will endeavor to answer them.

Thanks for watching and as we say in my hometown: Don't forget to be awesome.