×

We use cookies to help make LingQ better. By visiting the site, you agree to our cookie policy.


image

The Fraser Institute, Essential Coase: The Problem of Social Cost

Essential Coase: The Problem of Social Cost

Welcome to the essential ideas of Ronald Coase.

Coase's most important contribution in economics is his work on the role played by transaction

costs, legal rules, and property rights in allowing or impeding the negotiating and

bargaining that individuals do with one another, particularly when trying to resolve conflicts.

Recall from previous videos that transaction costs are those costs

that people and businesses incur when they exchange goods and services. For example,

the financial costs, as well as the time it takes to find someone with whom to exchange,

to negotiate the exchange, and to enforce the agreement and resolve disputes afterwards.

In his famous article “The Problem of Social Cost,”

Coase explained that in a world without these costs, people would be able to

easily negotiate with each other when conflicts arose to arrive at solutions.

But transaction costs do exist in the real world and they do impede

the bargaining that could be used to resolve conflicts. Coase's key insight is that the

level of transaction costs is affected by legal rules, including property rights.

Basically, good legal rules keep transaction costs low and, thus, help keep disputes to a minimum.

Let's explore this complex but incredibly important idea with Coase's original example

of a conflict between a doctor's office located next to a noisy

candy-maker – a case that ended up in court. The conflict arose because it was unclear if

the candy-maker owned the right to make noise, or if the doctor owned the right to be free of noise.

The lack of clarity of property rights meant that neither party knew how to bargain with the other.

When the court declared that the doctor had a right to be free of noise, bargaining became

easy. If the candy-maker valued the opportunity to continue operating noisily, he knew that he

had to purchase that right from the doctor. If the candy-maker didn't value that opportunity

that highly, he knew that he had to cease operations in that building and move locations.

Creating a clear property right within a legal system facilitated

bargaining and prevented further disputes. The insight from Coase—that transaction costs,

property rights and legal rules are critical to determine the degree to which people

can effectively resolve conflicts and use resources efficiently—spawned an entirely

new field in economics and is one of the reasons he was awarded the Nobel Prize.

For more information on Ronald Coase, visit EssentialCoase.org

And to learn more about Essential Scholars, visit EssentialScholars.org


Essential Coase: The Problem of Social Cost

Welcome to the essential ideas of Ronald Coase.

Coase's most important contribution in economics  is his work on the role played by transaction

costs, legal rules, and property rights in  allowing or impeding the negotiating and

bargaining that individuals do with one another,  particularly when trying to resolve conflicts.

Recall from previous videos that  transaction costs are those costs

that people and businesses incur when they  exchange goods and services. For example,

the financial costs, as well as the time it  takes to find someone with whom to exchange,

to negotiate the exchange, and to enforce the  agreement and resolve disputes afterwards.

In his famous article “The  Problem of Social Cost,”

Coase explained that in a world without  these costs, people would be able to

easily negotiate with each other when  conflicts arose to arrive at solutions.

But transaction costs do exist in  the real world and they do impede

the bargaining that could be used to resolve  conflicts. Coase's key insight is that the

level of transaction costs is affected by  legal rules, including property rights.

Basically, good legal rules keep transaction costs  low and, thus, help keep disputes to a minimum.

Let's explore this complex but incredibly  important idea with Coase's original example

of a conflict between a doctor's  office located next to a noisy

candy-maker – a case that ended up in court. The conflict arose because it was unclear if

the candy-maker owned the right to make noise, or  if the doctor owned the right to be free of noise.

The lack of clarity of property rights meant that  neither party knew how to bargain with the other.

When the court declared that the doctor had a  right to be free of noise, bargaining became

easy. If the candy-maker valued the opportunity  to continue operating noisily, he knew that he

had to purchase that right from the doctor. If  the candy-maker didn't value that opportunity

that highly, he knew that he had to cease  operations in that building and move locations.

Creating a clear property right  within a legal system facilitated

bargaining and prevented further disputes. The insight from Coase—that transaction costs,

property rights and legal rules are critical  to determine the degree to which people สิทธิในทรัพย์สินและกฎทางกฎหมายเป็นสิ่งสำคัญในการกำหนดระดับที่ผู้คน

can effectively resolve conflicts and use  resources efficiently—spawned an entirely สามารถแก้ไขข้อขัดแย้งได้อย่างมีประสิทธิภาพและใช้ทรัพยากรอย่างมีประสิทธิภาพ - เกิดจากทั้งหมด

new field in economics and is one of the  reasons he was awarded the Nobel Prize.

For more information on Ronald  Coase, visit EssentialCoase.org

And to learn more about Essential  Scholars, visit EssentialScholars.org