×

We use cookies to help make LingQ better. By visiting the site, you agree to our cookie policy.


image

Steve's Cafe, Donald Trump and Literacy

Donald Trump and Literacy

Hi there, Steve Kaufmann here at my Steve's Café and today I want to talk about literacy and I want to talk about Donald Trump and literacy, to some extent.

Before I get into that, today in the England-Russia match at the European Cup there was a great amount of violence, the Russian fans attacked the English fans. Mind you, the English fans had been behaving abominably for the last two-three days. As far as I'm concerned if they turf both teams, Russia and England, out of the European Cup that would probably be a good thing for the European Cup. Canada doesn't have a team there so who am I to say, but it's pretty disgusting to the way those hooligans are behaving. I gather it's also the French ultras and a whole bunch of others. What a miserable culture. We don't get that in hockey, although in Vancouver we had a riot when Vancouver lost in the Stanley Cup. Why do people behave so badly?

Anyway, getting back to Donald Trump, he sort of started me on this thing.

On CNN this morning, first, I watched Hillary Clinton speak to the Planned Parenthood Association and then I saw Donald Trump speak to some Christian group. If we leave aside their politics, the difference in the quality of the presentations is astounding. Hillary speaks well. She uses the language well. She sounds intelligent. She makes sense. She's balanced. She flows logically from one thought to the next. Trump is all over the place. He makes no sense, jumps from one thing to another. He likes to say I have a good brain, that's not evident from his speech. He likes to say I went to one of the best universities and that's also not evident. What do people learn at university?

So then I did a bit of research and it turns out that Trump has 27% more support than Hillary amongst white non-college graduates.

Amongst white college graduates it's even between Clinton and Trump. Now, I also found a website that tells me that people who don't go to college have lower literacy levels than people who graduate from college. That's not surprising. Although a lot of people who go to college don't graduate, but that's another issue. However, amongst college graduates in the United States only 25% have sufficient literacy skills to learn from reading, to really understand what they're reading. That 25% goes up to 31% amongst post-graduate students in the United States.

I should say that in the United States about 50% attend college, which in my mind is far too high, so is it possible that the support for Trump is higher amongst that 75% of college graduates who have poor literacy skills.

In my opinion, if a person has good literacy skills and can read a lot, read quickly and access a lot of information they would know that Donald Trump has historically in his career promised all kinds of stuff and delivered very little, Atlantic City, Trump University, Trump State and so forth. They would have, perhaps, a different perspective on what Trump is saying about making America great, we'll give you jobs, we'll do this, we'll do that. I don't know that for a fact, but we do know that the people who don't go to college are more likely to support Trump.

On the subject of literacy I also found another interesting website where they talk about the importance of oral literacy and sort of comprehensive literacy.

The reason I'm interested in the subject is one of the big issues in the American campaign is the increasing divide between rich and poor. In 1970, more people were bunched up. They had a bit of a bell curve insofar as income distribution was concerned. Most of the people were in the middle. Now we have a much flatter curve with a big spike of people in the top one percent, including Donald Trump of course. Statistics demonstrate that a high level of literacy is one of the best indicators of economic success, academic success and so forth. Therefore, the higher the level of literacy in a society, the better people will do. The more people who have poor literacy skills, the more people will have trouble doing well economically.

So this particular website which talks about the importance of oral and comprehensive literacy and talks about the importance of reading for learning really is something that I fully sympathize with and that's kind of behind LingQ, which as you know is my language-learning website, where every lesson has audio.

You want to listen and read. We have ways for people to focus on words and phrases, save these phrases. Now with text to speech you can hear the phrases you have saved. That relationship between listening, reading, focusing on words, learning words, learning phrases, enriching your vocabulary so that you can then actually access more challenging material, more interesting material, learn more, this is a virtuous cycle. The more you read, the better you can read, the better you read, the more material you access, the more words you know, the more words you can infer and so forth and so on. I'm going to leave links to these articles.

Really, what I want to stress is the importance of literacy, the importance of literacy in order to reduce inequality in any society, the rather low levels of literacy in the United States -- I don't have statistics for Canada or Europe, but there may be a similar situation there – that 75% of college graduates in the Unites States have low levels of literacy, that white non-college attendees are more likely to support Trump, more likely to put up with kind of speech that I heard this morning and I'm guessing a number of the college graduates who support Trump I suspect fall into that 75% of college graduates who have poor literacy skills.

So there you have it.

To me, Trump looks like a guy who doesn't ready very much. One more thing, I'd be quite open to having discussions here with other people. Two or three people could join me and we could exchange views. We could do it in English, French, Japanese, Chinese, Spanish, whatever language I speak, and we could have an exchange of views live for people to listen to.

So that's that.

Thank you for listening, bye for now.

Donald Trump and Literacy Donald Trump a gramotnost Donald Trump und die Alphabetisierung Donald Trump y la alfabetización Donald Trump et l'alphabétisation ドナルド・トランプと識字率 Donald Trump e a literacia Donald Trump ve Okuryazarlık 唐纳德·特朗普和识字率

Hi there, Steve Kaufmann here at my Steve's Café and today I want to talk about literacy and I want to talk about Donald Trump and literacy, to some extent.

Before I get into that, today in the England-Russia match at the European Cup there was a great amount of violence, the Russian fans attacked the English fans. Mind you, the English fans had been behaving abominably for the last two-three days. As far as I'm concerned if they turf both teams, Russia and England, out of the European Cup that would probably be a good thing for the European Cup. 私の知る限り、彼らがロシアとイングランドの両方のチームをヨーロッパカップから外すかどうかは、おそらくヨーロッパカップにとって良いことだろう。 Canada doesn't have a team there so who am I to say, but it's pretty disgusting to the way those hooligans are behaving. カナダにはチームがないので、誰と言ってもいいのですが、これらのフーリガンの振る舞いにはかなり嫌です。 I gather it's also the French ultras and a whole bunch of others. 私はそれがフランスのウルトラスや他のたくさんのものでもあることを収集します。 What a miserable culture. なんて惨めな文化でしょう。 We don't get that in hockey, although in Vancouver we had a riot when Vancouver lost in the Stanley Cup. バンクーバーではスタンレーカップで負けたときに暴動が発生しましたが、ホッケーではそれはわかりません。 Why do people behave so badly?

Anyway, getting back to Donald Trump, he sort of started me on this thing. とにかく、ドナルド・トランプに戻って、彼はある種私にこのことを始めました。

On CNN this morning, first, I watched Hillary Clinton speak to the Planned Parenthood Association and then I saw Donald Trump speak to some Christian group. 今朝のCNNで、私は最初にヒラリー・クリントンが計画された親子関係協会に話しかけるのを見ました、そして次にドナルド・トランプがいくつかのクリスチャングループに話しかけるのを見ました。 If we leave aside their politics, the difference in the quality of the presentations is astounding. 彼らの政治を脇に置いておくと、プレゼンテーションの質の違いは驚くべきものです。 Hillary speaks well. ヒラリーは上手に話します。 She uses the language well. She sounds intelligent. 彼女は頭がいいようだ。 She makes sense. Sie macht Sinn. 彼女は理にかなっています。 She's balanced. 彼女はバランスが取れています。 She flows logically from one thought to the next. 彼女はある考えから次の考えへと論理的に流れます。 Trump is all over the place. トランプはいたるところにあります。 He makes no sense, jumps from one thing to another. 彼は意味がなく、あるものから別のものへとジャンプします。 He likes to say I have a good brain, that's not evident from his speech. 彼は私が良い頭脳を持っていると言うのが好きです、それは彼のスピーチから明らかではありません。 He likes to say I went to one of the best universities and that's also not evident. 彼は私が最高の大学の1つに行ったと言うのが好きです、そしてそれも明白ではありません。 What do people learn at university? 人々は大学で何を学びますか?

So then I did a bit of research and it turns out that Trump has 27% more support than Hillary amongst white non-college graduates. それで私は少し調査をしました、そしてトランプは白人の非大学卒業生の間でヒラリーより27%多くの支持を持っていることがわかりました。

Amongst white college graduates it's even between Clinton and Trump. 白人の大学卒業生の間では、それはクリントンとトランプの間ですらあります。 Now, I also found a website that tells me that people who don't go to college have lower literacy levels than people who graduate from college. さて、大学に進学しない人は大学を卒業する人よりも識字率が低いというウェブサイトも見つけました。 That's not surprising. それは驚くべきことではありません。 Although a lot of people who go to college don't graduate, but that's another issue. 大学に通う人の多くは卒業しませんが、それは別の問題です。 However, amongst college graduates in the United States only 25% have sufficient literacy skills to learn from reading, to really understand what they're reading. しかし、米国の大学卒業生の中で、彼らが読んでいるものを本当に理解するために、読書から学ぶのに十分な識字能力を持っているのはわずか25%です。 That 25% goes up to 31% amongst post-graduate students in the United States.

I should say that in the United States about 50% attend college, which in my mind is far too high, so is it possible that the support for Trump is higher amongst that 75% of college graduates who have poor literacy skills. Ich sollte sagen, dass in den Vereinigten Staaten etwa 50 % das College besuchen, was meiner Meinung nach viel zu hoch ist, also ist es möglich, dass die Unterstützung für Trump unter den 75 % der College-Absolventen mit schlechten Lese- und Schreibfähigkeiten höher ist. アメリカでは約50%が大学に通っていますが、私の考えでは高すぎるので、識字能力の低い大卒者の75%の中でトランプへの支持が高い可能性があります。

In my opinion, if a person has good literacy skills and can read a lot, read quickly and access a lot of information they would know that Donald Trump has historically in his career promised all kinds of stuff and delivered very little, Atlantic City, Trump University, Trump State and so forth. 私の意見では、人が優れた識字能力を持ち、たくさん読んで、すばやく読んで、たくさんの情報にアクセスできるなら、ドナルド・トランプは歴史的に彼のキャリアの中であらゆる種類のものを約束し、ほとんど提供していないことを知っているでしょう、アトランティックシティ、トランプ大学、トランプ州など。 They would have, perhaps, a different perspective on what Trump is saying about making America great, we'll give you jobs, we'll do this, we'll do that. 彼らはおそらく、トランプがアメリカを素晴らしいものにすることについて言っていることについて異なる見方をしているでしょう、私たちはあなたに仕事を与えます、私たちはこれをします、私たちはそれをします。 I don't know that for a fact, but we do know that the people who don't go to college are more likely to support Trump. 事実はわかりませんが、大学に進学しない人はトランプを支持する可能性が高いことは知っています。

On the subject of literacy I also found another interesting website where they talk about the importance of oral literacy and sort of comprehensive literacy. リテラシーについては、口頭リテラシーと一種の包括的なリテラシーの重要性について話している別の興味深いウェブサイトも見つけました。

The reason I'm interested in the subject is one of the big issues in the American campaign is the increasing divide between rich and poor. 私がこのテーマに興味を持っている理由は、アメリカのキャンペーンの大きな問題の1つは、金持ちと貧乏人の間の格差が拡大していることです。 In 1970, more people were bunched up. 1970年には、より多くの人々が集まりました。 They had a bit of a bell curve insofar as income distribution was concerned. 所得分配に関する限り、彼らは少しベルカーブを持っていました。 Most of the people were in the middle. ほとんどの人は真ん中にいました。 Now we have a much flatter curve with a big spike of people in the top one percent, including Donald Trump of course. 今では、ドナルド・トランプを含め、上位1%に人が急増している、はるかに平坦な曲線になっています。 Statistics demonstrate that a high level of literacy is one of the best indicators of economic success, academic success and so forth. 統計によると、高いレベルの識字能力は、経済的成功、学問的成功などの最良の指標の1つです。 Therefore, the higher the level of literacy in a society, the better people will do. したがって、社会の識字レベルが高いほど、人々はより良い行動をとることができます。 The more people who have poor literacy skills, the more people will have trouble doing well economically. 識字能力の低い人が多いほど、経済的にうまくやるのに苦労する人が増えます。

So this particular website which talks about the importance of oral and comprehensive literacy and talks about the importance of reading for learning really is something that I fully sympathize with and that's kind of behind LingQ, which as you know is my language-learning website, where every lesson has audio. ですから、口頭で包括的なリテラシーの重要性と学習のための読書の重要性について話しているこの特定のウェブサイトは、私が完全に共感しているものであり、それはあなたが知っているように私の言語学習ウェブサイトであるLingQの背後にあるようなものです。すべてのレッスンには音声があります。

You want to listen and read. We have ways for people to focus on words and phrases, save these phrases. Now with text to speech you can hear the phrases you have saved. That relationship between listening, reading, focusing on words, learning words, learning phrases, enriching your vocabulary so that you can then actually access more challenging material, more interesting material, learn more, this is a virtuous cycle. 聞く、読む、単語に焦点を合わせる、単語を学ぶ、フレーズを学ぶ、語彙を充実させることの間の関係は、実際にもっと挑戦的な資料、より興味深い資料にアクセスし、より多くを学ぶことができるようになります。これは好循環です。 The more you read, the better you can read, the better you read, the more material you access, the more words you know, the more words you can infer and so forth and so on. 読めば読むほど、読みやすくなり、読みやすくなり、アクセスする資料が増え、知っている単語が増え、推測できる単語が増えます。 I'm going to leave links to these articles.

Really, what I want to stress is the importance of literacy, the importance of literacy in order to reduce inequality in any society, the rather low levels of literacy in the United States -- I don't have statistics for Canada or Europe, but there may be a similar situation there – that 75% of college graduates in the Unites States have low levels of literacy, that white non-college attendees are more likely to support Trump, more likely to put up with kind of speech that I heard this morning and I'm guessing a number of the college graduates who support Trump I suspect fall into that 75% of college graduates who have poor literacy skills. 本当に強調したいのは、リテラシーの重要性、あらゆる社会の不平等を減らすためのリテラシーの重要性、米国のリテラシーのレベルがかなり低いことです。カナダやヨーロッパの統計はありませんが、そこにも同様の状況があるかもしれません。米国の大学卒業生の75%は識字率が低く、白人の非大学生はトランプを支持する可能性が高く、私が聞いたようなスピーチに我慢する可能性が高いです。朝、トランプを支持する大卒者の多くは、識字能力の低い大卒者の75%に該当すると思います。

So there you have it.

To me, Trump looks like a guy who doesn't ready very much. 私には、トランプはあまり準備ができていない男のように見えます。 One more thing, I'd be quite open to having discussions here with other people. もう1つ、私はここで他の人と話し合うことに非常にオープンです。 Two or three people could join me and we could exchange views. 2、3人で参加して意見交換をすることができました。 We could do it in English, French, Japanese, Chinese, Spanish, whatever language I speak, and we could have an exchange of views live for people to listen to. 私は英語、フランス語、日本語、中国語、スペイン語、私が話すどんな言語でもそれを行うことができ、人々が聞くためにライブで意見交換をすることができました。

So that's that.

Thank you for listening, bye for now.