Kenapa WHO Gagal Menangani Corona? | Sejarah dan Struktur WHO
|WHO|failed|Handling|Corona virus|||Structure|
Warum hat es die WHO versäumt, sich mit Corona zu befassen? | Geschichte und Struktur der WHO
Why Did WHO Fail to Handle Corona? | History and Structure of WHO
¿Por qué la OMS no se ocupó de Corona? | Historia y estructura de la OMS
Pourquoi l'OMS n'a-t-elle pas réagi face à Corona ? Histoire et structure de l'OMS
WHOはなぜコロナに対処できなかったのか｜WHOの歴史と構造
Waarom slaagde de WHO er niet in Corona aan te pakken? | Geschiedenis en structuur van de WHO
Dlaczego WHO nie poradziła sobie z koronawirusem? | Historia i struktura WHO
Porque é que a OMS não conseguiu lidar com o Corona? | História e estrutura da OMS
世卫组织为何未能应对新冠疫情？ |世界卫生组织的历史和结构
為什麼世衛組織未能應對新冠病毒？ |世界衛生組織的歷史和結構
Akhir-akhir ini,
Recently,
Ultimamente,
Badan Kesehatan Dunia atau WHO,
the World Health Organization, or WHO,
mendapat banyak kritikan karena dianggap gagal
||criticism||considered|failed
has received a lot of criticism for failing to handle COVID-19.
menangani COVID-19.
Presiden AS Donald Trump: WHO salah total. Mereka sangat salah. Mereka menganggap remeh ancaman ini.
Pembawa berita: Jepang mengkritik WHO karena dianggap membungkuk ke Cina dan mengecualikan Taiwan.
Pada bulan Juni 2020,
handle|COVID-19||||Donald Trump||||||||underestimate|underestimate|threat||news anchor||||||considered|bowing||||excluding|Taiwan|||
deal with COVID-19. US President Donald Trump: WHO is totally wrong. They were so wrong. They underestimated this threat. Announcer: Japan criticizes WHO for bowing to China and excluding Taiwan. In June 2020,
tercatat terdapat lebih dari
recorded|||
(US President Donald Trump: WHO got it wrong.)
8 juta orang terinfeksi COVID-19 di seluruh dunia.
||infected||||
(They got it very wrong.)
Namun,
(They also minimized the threat.)
apakah fungsi dan batasan dari WHO?
|||limitations||
(Anchor: Japan blasted the World Health Organization)
Dan kenapa,
(for bowing to China)
meskipun memiliki berbagai pengalaman,
although|||experiences
(and excluding Taiwan.)
WHO gagal dalam membendung penyebaran COVID-19?
|failed||to curb|spread|
By June 2020,
Badan kesehatan dunia
more than 8 million people contracted COVID-19 worldwide.
dibentuk pada tahun 1948
formed||
formed in 1948
demi menjalin kerjasama antar-negara
for the sake of|forge|cooperation|between countries|
However,
dalam bidang kesehatan maupun kebersihan.
|field||and|
what are the functions and limitations of the WHO?
Sebagai agensi di bawah Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB),
|agency|||United Nations|||UN
And why -- despite its many experiences --
WHO memiliki peran yang sangat signifikan
||role|||
WHO has a very significant role
akan tetapi peran ini tidak datang begitu saja.
||role|||||
did the WHO fail to contain the spread of COVID-19?
No entanto, este papel não é fácil.
Melainkan melalui sejarah yang panjang dan tragis.
but rather||||||tragic
The world health agency
Pelo contrário, tem uma longa e trágica história.
Kesehatan memang sering dianggap
|||is considered
was formed in 1948
sebagai masalah sampingan dalam isu global.
||side issue||issue|
to establish cooperation between countries
Namun,
in the fields of health and hygiene.
sejarah menunjukan bahwa penyebaran penyakit
|indicates||spread|
As a specialized agency of the United Nations,
cenderung membunuh lebih banyak manusia
tend to||||
WHO played a very significant role,
dibandingkan peperangan.
compared to|warfare
one that didn't just appear out of thin air.
Sejak dulu,
Rather it was born from a long history of tragedy.
Penyakit menyebar seperti Cholera,
|spreads like||cholera
Health is often treated as secondary in global issues.
Tifus,
Typhus
Campak,
Measles
However,
dan masih banyak lagi
history shows that diseases tend to kill more people
juga memakan korban yang tidak sedikit.
||victims|||
also took a large number of casualties.
Di tahun 1918,
than war.
sebuah penyakit flu
Historically,
yang sering disebut sebagai
||called|
contagious diseases such as Cholera,
flu Spanyol
Typhus,
menyebar ke seluruh Eropa dan Amerika.
spread|||||
Measles,
Pada akhirnya,
|finally
and many more
penyakit ini membunuh kurang lebih
|||about|
claimed massive amounts of lives.
50 juta korban di akhir Perang Dunia I.
|victims|||||
In 1918,
Di saat dunia menganggap
|||considers
a type of influenza
17 juta korban jiwa akibat Perang Dunia 1
|victims||due to||
often referred to as
merupakan hal yang tragis,
is a|||tragic matter
the Spanish flu,
penyakit flu yang awalnya dianggap sepele ini
|||initially|considered trivial|trivial|
spread through Europe and the Americas.
justru menghabisi 3 kali lebih banyak nyawa.
instead|eliminate||||lives
In the end,
Belajar dari tragedi tersebut,
the disease killed approximately
Liga Bangsa-Bangsa membentuk
League|||to form
50 million people at the end of World War I.
League of Nations Health Organization (LNHO)
|||Health||Health Organization
While the world considered
pada tahun 1922 dengan tujuan untuk
|||goal|
World War One's 17 million casualties to be tragic,
mengontrol dan mencegah penyebaran penyakit.
to control||preventing|spread|
Mereka melakukan ini dengan
the flu that was initially considered trivial,
mengembangkan sistem peringatan dini.
developing||warning|early warning
ended up taking 3x as many lives.
Jadi apabila ada satu negara anggota
|if||||
Learning from this tragedy,
yang mengalami penyakit menyebar,
|experiencing||spreads
the League of Nations formed
mereka dapat mengabari LBB.
||informing|LBB
the League of Nations Health Organization (LNHO) in 1922,
LBB kemudian memberikan peringatan
|||warning
kepada negara anggota lain
||member state|
tentang cara-cara bagaimana
This was done by developing an early warning system.
mereka dapat mempersiapkan diri
dalam menghadapi penyakit tersebut.
|facing||
Where if a member country
LBB kemudian akan memberikan bantuan teknis
LBB will|||||
experienced a sudden spread of disease,
untuk melawan penyakit tersebut
|to fight against||
they could notify the League of Nations.
dengan mengirim tim ahli.
|||expert team
The League then gave warnings
Selain itu,
to other member countries
LNHO terus melakukan riset
|||research
about how to best prepare themselves
dan membangun kerjasama dengan berbagai institusi
||collaboration|||institutions
baik pemerintahan maupun non-pemerintahan.
||as well as|non-government|
in facing the disease.
WHO bisa dikatakan
The League would also give technical aid
adalah kelanjutan dari organisasi ini.
|the continuation|||
to fight the disease by sending a team of experts.
Untuk mencegah menyebarnya suatu penyakit,
|to prevent|the spread of||
To prevent the spread of a disease,
WHO harus terlebih dahulu
||first|
In addition,
menerima laporan dari salah satu anggotanya,
receiving reports from|||||its member
the LNHO continued to conduct research
mengirim tim ahli untuk memberikan bantuan
||expert|||
and build collaborations with various institutions,
bagi negara anggota yang terkena dampak,
for member countries||||affected|impact
both governmental and non-governmental.
dan berkoordinasi dengan negara anggota lain
|coordinate with|||member states|
The WHO can be seen as a continuation of this organization.
untuk mencegah penyebaran lebih jauh.
|prevent|spread||
Memang, kedaulatan negara merupakan hal yang penting.
|sovereignty||is||that|
To prevent global transmission of a disease,
Akan tetapi, WHO bukanlah
the WHO must first receive a report from a member country,
sebuah rumah sakit raksasa,
|||giant
WHO hanya bekerja sebagai koordinator.
send a team of experts to assist affected countries
Dan itu artinya,
keberhasilan WHO sangat bergantung pada
success|||depends on|
and coordinate with other countries to prevent further spread.
komitmen dan keterbukaan anggota-anggotanya.
||openness||
commitment and openness of its members.
Apabila ada anggota yang
If||member|
As such, state sovereignty is crucial.
menutupi sebuah penyakit menyebar,
covering up|||spreading a disease
But it must be said that WHO is not a giant hospital.
WHO tidak akan dapat memperingati
||||commemorate
anggota lain dalam waktu yang tepat
other members|||||appropriate time
Instead, WHO only works as a coordinator.
dan justru memperluas penyakit yang ada.
|instead|and actually expanding|||
And that means,
Atau,
WHO's success is highly dependent
apabila WHO terlambat menyebarkan informasi
if|||disseminate|
on the commitment and transparency of its members.
yang diterima dari negara anggota,
|received|||
If member countries cover up knowledge of a disease,
atau menyebarkan informasi yang salah,
hal tersebut dapat berubah menjadi lebih fatal.
|||change|||more serious
the WHO would not be able to warn others in a timely manner,
Ambil contoh, tahun 2003.
Pembawa berita: Meningkatnya kasus SARS. Panik meningkat di Hong Kong di mana virus baru menyebar di kota.
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Rakyat China
|example||Carrier||Increasing||SARS|Panic|increased||Hong Kong|Hong Kong|||virus||spread|||Ministry||||China
Take, for example, the year 2003. News anchor: Rising cases of SARS. Panic is rising in Hong Kong where a new virus is spreading in the city. Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China
melaporkan penyebaran kasus Pneumonia
reporting|spread||pneumonia cases
resulting in a worsening crisis.
yang kemudian dinamakan sebagai
||named as|
Or if the WHO is late
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS).
severe|severe|Respiratory|syndrome|
Akan tetapi,
Otoritas RRC memakan waktu yang terlalu lama
|Chinese authorities|||||
or if the WHO inadvertently spread misinformation,
sebelum mengklasifikasikan penyakit tersebut
|classifying|disease|that
it would be doing more harm than good.
dengan potensi pandemik.
Pembawa berita: Kritik mengatakan bahwa Cina memilih untuk menyelamatkan harga diri daripada menyelamatkan nyawa. Cina mengetahui tentang pandemik tersebut tetapi memilih menutupi informasi.
WHO kemudian mengkoordinasikan
with|potential||carrier of news|news|Criticism||that|China|chose to|for|saving|price|self||save|lives||||||||cover||||to coordinate
Take for instance, the events of 2003.
Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network
|epidemic occurrence|alert||Response|network
(News anchor: There is a rise in SARS.)
untuk memberikan bantuan tambahan bagi pemerintahan.
|||additional help|for providing additional assistance to the government|
(Panic grips Hong Kong)
Dalam waktu 4 bulan,
(because a deadly new virus)
penyebaran penyakit SARS dapat diberhentikan.
spread||||stopped
(sweeps through the city.)
Setelah kasus SARS,
The Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China (PRC)
WHO menyadari
|realize
reported a rapid spread of pneumonia cases,
bahwa mengandalkan kejujuran dari
|relying on|honesty|
later known as: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS).
negara anggota saja tidaklah cukup.
|member state|||
Member states alone are not enough.
Di tahun 2005,
However, the PRC authorities took too long
para negara anggota menyetujui
||members|approve
member states agree
Revised Guideline on International Health Regulation.
Revised|Pedoman|on|||regulation
in classifying the disease as having pandemic potential.
Peraturan ini pada dasarnya
regulation|||essentially
This regulation basically
memberikan WHO lebih banyak kewenangan
||||authority
(News anchor: China -- say its critics --)
untuk memperingatkan negara anggota
|to warn||member
(China chose to save face)
akan potensi penyakit menyebar
|||will spread
(rather than save lives.)
sebelum mendapatkan persetujuan
||approval
(The Chinese knew about the outbreak)
dari negara sumber penyakit tersebut.
||source||
(but ordered silence.)
Untuk mencegah politisasi data,
|to prevent|politicization|
The WHO then coordinated
WHO juga berwenan
||has authority
the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network
dalam menyelidiki potensi penyakit menyebar
|to investigate|||
to provide additional assistance to affected countries.
menggunakan data-data non-pemerintahyang kredibel.
||||government|credible
Within 4 months,
Hal ini sangat membantu di tahun 2015,
the spread of SARS was stopped successfully.
ketika kantor kawasan WHO di Afrika
||region|||
After the SARS case the WHO realized
mendapat laporan akan penyebaran virus Ebola di Guinea.
|||spread||Ebola||Guinea
Seketika juga,
instantly|also
that relying on member countries' honesty was insufficient.
WHO dapat lebih leluasa
|||more freely
memobilisasi asetnya dan mengirim tim
mobilize||||
In 2005, member countries approved
ke daerah yang terkena dampak Ebola
|||affected area|affected area|Ebola
khususnya di Liberia.
||Liberia
the Revised Guideline on International Health Regulation.
Penyebaran Ebola menjadi tidak separah yang dulu.
spread|Ebola|||severe||
This regulation essentially gave the WHO more authority
Banyak yang mengkritik WHO
dalam kasus Ebola.
||Ebola
to warn member countries on possible pandemics
Akan tetapi setidaknya,
||at least
WHO berhasil membendung penyakit tersebut.
|succeeded|contain||
before getting approval from the disease's country of origin.
Lalu, apa yang terjadi pada kasus penyakit COVID-19?
Dibandingkan dengan kasus sebelumnya,
compared|||
To prevent data politicization,
COVID-19 memakan jauh lebih banyak korban jiwa
|||||victims|
the WHO also authorized the ability
dan memakan waktu lebih lama untuk dibendung
||||||be contained
Di Amerika Serikat sendiri,
using credible non-governmental data.
jumlah korban jiwa akibat COVID-19
number of victims||||
This was especially helpful in 2015,
telah melebihi korban jiwa akibat
|exceeded|victim count||due to
when the WHO's regional office in Africa
Perang Korea, Vietnam, hingga Iraq.
|||until|Iraq
received reports on the spread of the Ebola virus in Guinea.
Semenjak WHO didirikan,
Since||established
Without delay,
misi organisasi tersebut semakin berkembang
mission||||develop
the WHO could freely mobilize its assets and send teams
dari mencegah penyebaran penyakit
|preventing|spread of disease|
hingga mencakup isu seperti
|includes||
to areas affected by Ebola,
obesitas,
obesity
especially in Liberia.
kecanduan,
addiction
As such, the spread of Ebola was not as severe as in the past.
bahkan isu mengenai perubahan iklim
||about|change|climate
Many criticized the WHO during the Ebola efforts.
dan kecelakaan lalu lintas.
|accident||traffic
Tentunya dengan misi yang sangat luas tersebut,
Of course||mission||||
But at the very least,
fokus dan prioritas WHO
||priority|
the WHO managed to stem the disease.
menjadi semakin….rancu.
||confused
So then what happened with the response to COVID-19?
Di tahun 2017,
Compared to previous cases,
WHO melantik Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
|appoint|Tedros Adhanom|Adhanom|Ghebreyesus
COVID-19 has claimed far more lives
sebagai Direktur Jenderal.
and has taken much longer to contain.
Sebagai pimpinan teratas,
|top leader|top leader
In the United States itself,
Tedros memilih untuk lebih mengutamakan
|||more|prioritize
COVID-19 fatalities have exceeded the death tolls
peningkatan akses kesehatan pada masyarakat secara luas
increase||||society||
di atas dari kapasitas WHO dalam merespon wabah.
||||||responding|outbreak
of the Korean, Vietnam, and Iraq Wars.
Target yang sangat ambisius ini pun
Since the WHO was founded,
akhirnya terjerat masalah yang sangat genting,
finally|caught in||||critical
the organization's mission has grown
yaitu Anggaran Belanja yang terbatas.
namely||||limited
from preventing the spread of diseases
Anggaran WHO sangatlah kecil.
Budget||very|
to addressing issues such as
Di tahun 2020 dan 2021,
obesity,
WHO hanya memiliki anggaran
|||budget
addiction,
5 miliar USD.
billion|USD
climate change,
Sebagai perbandingan,
|for comparison
and even traffic accidents.
anggaran kesehatan nasional Australia,
budget|||
Of course with these broad missions,
negara yang memiliki populasi 24.9 juta jiwa,
the WHO's focus and priorities
bernilai 120 miliar USD.
valued||
have become increasingly
Pendanaannya pun berasal dari dua sumber utama.
its funding|||||sources|main sources
... muddled
Pertama,
In 2017,
seluruh anggotanya wajib memberikan iuran wajib
|its members|mandatory||contribution|mandatory
the WHO appointed Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
untuk mendanai operasional WHO.
|funding||
as Director General.
Dana iuran ini dapat digunakan WHO dengan leluasa,
Fund|||||||freely
As leader in charge,
sesuai dengan prioritas setiap Direktur Jendral.
according to|||||
Tedros chose to prioritize
Kedua,
improving health access in communities
WHO juga dapat menerima dana sukarela
|||receive|fund|voluntary
above the WHO's capacity to respond to potential outbreaks.
baik dari aktor negara maupun non-negara
||||or|non|
Such an ambitious target eventually hit a major roadblock,
seperti yayasan atau perusahaan
|foundation||
hingga organisasi internasional lain.
until|||
which was the WHO's limited budget.
Berbeda dengan iuran wajib,
The WHO's budget is incredibly small.
dana yang diberikan secara sukarela
In 2020 and 2021,
hanya boleh digunakan dalam aktivitas
||||activity
the WHO only had a budget of
yang disetujui oleh donatur.
|||donor
5 billion USD.
Dan disinilah permasalahan WHO dimulai.
|here is|the issue||
In comparison,
Semenjak krisis finansial tahun 2008,
Since||financial|
Australia's national health budget,
WHO justru semakin bergantung
a country with a population of 24.9 million people,
pada dana sukarela daripada iuran wajib.
||||contribution|
is 120 billion USD.
Bahkan, kontribusi wajib dari negara anggota
||mandatory|||
Funding also comes from two main sources.
hanya mendukung 20% dari keseluruhan budget
|support|||budget support
Firstly,
yang dimiliki oleh WHO,
|owned||
all members must provide mandatory contributions
yakni 5 miliar USD.
namely 5 billion USD||
to fund WHO operations.
Sementara 80% dari dana WHO
meanwhile||fund|
WHO can use this contribution fund freely,
berasal dari dana sukarela.
||fund|voluntary funds
according to the priorities of each Director General.
Hanya 20% anggaran yang diterima oleh WHO
|budget||received||
Secondly,
dapat digunakan sesuka mereka.
can||as they wish|
the WHO also receives donations
Sedangkan 80% dari anggaran tersebut,
while||budget|
from both state and non-state actors,
harus digunakan untuk memenuhi
|||meet requirements
such as foundations, companies or international organizations.
kepentingan dari para donatur.
interests|||donors
Hal ini memberikan organisasi non-pemerintah
||||non|
Unlike member countries' mandatory contributions,
seperti Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,
||Melinda|Gates|Yayasan
donations provided voluntarily
pengaruh yang signifikan dalam prioritas WHO.
may only be used in activities approved by their donors.
Dana sukarela dari Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
yang kini menjadi penyokong terbesar kedua di WHO,
|||supporter||||
And this is where WHO's problems begin.
sebagian besar ditujukan
part||intended
Since the 2008 financial crisis,
untuk memberantas penyakit Polio.
|eradicate||Polio
the WHO has relied more and more
Akibatnya, pemberantasan polio
As a result|eradication|polio
on voluntary donations rather than mandatory contributions.
merupakan prioritas utama dari WHO
is a||||
In fact, mandatory contributions from member countries
dengan 26.5% dari dana operasi WHO
with||fund||
only make up 20% of WHO's total budget,
wajib dialokasikan untuk memberantas Polio.
mandatory|allocated||to eradicate|
Sedangkan hanya 5.96% saja
While||
amounting to 5 billion USD.
yang akan digunakan untuk merespon wabah tertentu.
||||respond to|outbreak|specific outbreak
While 80% of WHO funding comes from voluntary donations.
Sejak tahun 1980,
Negara anggota WHO lebih memilih
Member states||||
Only 20% of the budget received by the WHO
untuk memberikan sumbangan sukarela
||donation|voluntary contribution
can be used in any way they see fit.
dibandingkan membayar iuran wajib
compared to||contributions|mandatory
Meanwhile, 80% of WHO's budget
untuk meluaskan pengaruh politiknya di organisasi tersebut.
|expand|influence||||
must be used to fulfill donors' interests.
Kurangnya dana dan independensi,
The lack of|funds||independence
dan permainan politik.
This gives non-governmental organizations,
Tentunya alasan-alasan tersebut
Certainly|reasons||
such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
sangat menghambat kemampuan WHO
|hinders WHO's ability|ability|
significant leverage in WHO priorities.
dalam menangani COVID-19.
|handling|
Voluntary funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,
Selain itu,
which is now the second largest supporter of the WHO,
kepemimpinan WHO yang cenderung lamban,
leadership|||tends|
is mostly aimed at eradicating polio.
semakin memperparah situasi.
|worsen|
Di awal tahun 2020,
As a result, polio eradication is a top priority for WHO,
Tiongkok sudah melaporkan pada WHO
|already|||
akan sebuah kasus pneumonia yang masih misterius
|||pneumonia|||mysterious
with 26.5% of operational funds allocated to eradicate polio.
di Wuhan, provinsi Hubei.
|Wuhan||Hubei Province
Berdasarkan media nasional, Xinhua,
Based on|||Xinhua News Agency
Meanwhile, only 5.96%
penyakit ini memiliki kemungkinan menular
|||possibility|contagious
will be used to respond to disease outbreaks.
dari manusia ke manusia lain.
from||||
Since 1980,
Sudah sepantasnya WHO memperingati dunia
|it is fitting||commemorate|
WHO member states have preferred to make
akan potensi berbahaya ini.
voluntary donations rather than paying mandatory dues.
Anehnya,
strangely
WHO mengklaim pada tanggal 12 Januari,
|claim|||
This helps expand their political agenda and influence in WHO.
bahwa mereka menerima data yang menunjukan
||receive|||indicating that
Lack of funds and independence
bahwa tidak ada kasus penularan dari manusia ke manusia.
||||transmission||||
and political games...
Data ini tentu menjadi rujukan
||||reference point
... are all realities that greatly hinder WHO's ability
bagi negara lain yang bergantung
for||||depends on
pada penjelasan dari WHO.
|explanation||
to deal with COVID-19.
Selain itu, pada tanggal 31 Desember 2019,
In addition, WHO's leadership tends to act slowly,
Taiwan,
Hong Kong
exacerbating the situation.
dan Singapura
In early 2020,
mulai mengambil langkah preventif
||step|preventive
China reported to the WHO
dengan memperketat pengawasan
|tightening|supervision
a mysterious growth of pneumonia
di bagian kedatangan internasional bandara masing-masing.
|section|arrival||||
in Wuhan, Hubei province.
Kembali lagi,
According to the national media outlet, Xinhua,
WHO kembali mengatakan bahwa hal tersebut
||said again|||
this disease had the possibility of transmitting
tidak terlalu diperlukan.
from human to human.
Hingga akhir bulan Januari pun,
until||||
With this, the WHO should have alerted the world to this danger.
WHO masih bersikeras bahwa segala upaya
||insist||all|efforts
untuk menutup pintu kedatangan internasional
|||arrival|
Curiously though, the WHO claimed that on January 12th
tidak diperlukan,
bahkan akan memperburuk penanganan COVID-19.
Tedros: Tidak ada alasan untuk tindakan yang dapat menganggu perjalanan dan perdagangan internasional.
||worsen|handling||Tedros Adhanom|||reason||actions|||disrupt|||trade|
they received data showing no cases
Kementerian Luar Negeri Tiongkok pun
Ministry||||
sempat menuduh Amerika Serikat
had time to|accused||
This became a reference for other countries who depended
menyebarkan panik dan stigma buruk
spreading|panic||stigma|
dengan kebijakannya.
Pembawa berita: Sementara Cina memprotes tindakan oleh Amerika Serikat dan negara-negara lain yang melarang masuknya warga negara Cina. Geng Shuang: Kami menolak tindakan Amerika Serikat yang mencela Cina karena virus ini.
|its policy|Bearer||while||protesting|actions||||||||||entry|citizens|||Gang|Shuang gang||reject|actions||||condemn|||virus|
on WHO's explanations to inform their responses.
Ironisnya,
Ironically
In addition, on December 31, 2019,
Republik Rakyat Tiongkok sendiri
Taiwan,
membatasi kedatangan warga asing di negaranya
to limit||citizens|||
Hong Kong
atas dasar mencegah penyebaran virus Corona.
||preventing|spread||
and Singapore
Dan kebijakan ini,
|policy|
began taking preventive steps by tightening surveillance
tidak terlalu mendapat banyak kritikan dari WHO sendiri.
||||criticism||WHO itself|
Jauh dari koordinasi,
at their airports' international arrivals section.
WHO justru menimbulkan frustasi
|actually|causes|
Again,
dari berbagai negara karena perilakunya
||||behavior
the WHO said such steps were unnecessary.
yang tidak berani mengambil langkah tegas
||dare||step action|
terhadap Tiongkok.
Until the end of January,
WHO seakan mengabaikan wewenangnya
|||authority
the WHO still insisted that all efforts
untuk mengkritisi data yang diberikan Tiongkok
to halt international travel were unnecessary,
dengan menggunakan sumber-sumber lain
|||sources|
and could even worsen the handling of COVID-19.
yang mengindikasikan pemalsuan data,
|indicating|falsification|
represi kebebasan berbicara,
repression||
(WHO's Tedros: There is no reason for measures)
dan lain-lain.
(that unnecessarily interfere)
RRC bahkan dilaporkan
PRC||
(with international travel and trade.)
telah membungkam tenaga medis
|silenced||
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs
yang menyebarkan peringatan dini
|disseminate|warning|
also accused the United States
akan bahaya dari Virus Corona ini.
of spreading panic and stigma with its policies.
Frustrasi dari Amerika Serikat pun
Frustration from the United States||||
semakin tidak terbendung.
Presiden Trump: Hari ini saya memberitahukan administrasi untuk menghentikan pendanaan WHO.
||unstoppable||||||||||funding|
(Announcer: Meanwhile China has denounced)
Karena korban jiwa COVID-19 di Amerika Serikat
(by the US and other countries)
merupakan yang tertinggi di dunia.
is||||
(of denying entry of Chinese nationals)
Presiden Donald Trump pun bergegas mengancam akan
||||hurry|threatens to|
(Geng Shuang: We oppose US attempts)
mengurangi bantuan finansial AS kepada WHO.
(to stigmatize China)
Apabila Donald Trump berhasil
if|||succeeds
(over the virus.)
mencabut dukungan finansial terhadap WHO,
withdraw|support||to|
Ironically,
WHO akan semakin kesulitan
The People's Republic of China itself
dalam menanggapi kasus COVID-19.
|responding to||
limited the arrival of foreigners into the country
Akan tetapi sekarang pun,
on the basis of preventing the spread of the Coronavirus.
apakah WHO sudah berhasil?
|||succeeded
And yet China's policy
