We regularly get requests to add features, functions, and additional languages at LingQ. We have limited resources and have to be careful where we spend our time and effort. Adding Korean was not trivial in terms of programming as Boris can attest. We had a few start up issues which required further development. Subsequent languages may be smoother.
However, we also have to create the logo and colour for the language and worry about content. For the Korean I contacted various people, including a visit to the local Korean language newspaper with “biolife”, one of our LingQ members who lives in Vancouver and is fluent in Korean. We are hoping to get some of their free-lance writers to record stories they have written and for which they own the copyright. Still, despite the contributions of Hyun Wu Sun of “Talk to me in Korean”, and James, our library still looks pretty bare. Someone joining LingQ for Korean has a right to feel disappointed. It does not make us look good.
I am always in favour of more languages and more features. It is more fun. However, Mark is responsible for making sure that LingQ gets onto a sound footing economically. No one else is responsible. So when we get comments like the following on the LingQ blog, we just throw up our hands.
"In my opinion it is a disgrace that Steve still refuses to add Dutch as a language at LingQ
(I simply refuse to believe that there is a higher demand for something like Korean!)"
Leaving aside the fact that there are a lot more Korean speakers in the world than Dutch speakers, we are simply not obliged to add any languages. LingQ is not a community facility pad for by tax-payers somewhere.
The bottom line to us has to be whether adding languages will increase our membership, and eventually paid membership.
If we add Czech, Dutch, or Polish, or even larger languages like Arabic, Turkish, Indonesian, Thai, Farsi, Vietnamese, will we get enough content? Are there a significant number of people out there who are prepared to join LingQ to study these languages? How do we get the word out?
Korean was the clear cut winner in our recent competition. So far the Korean experiment has been a little bit disappointing. The best way to ensure more languages, or new features, at LingQ is for everyone to try to encourage more people to join LingQ, to understand the system and to use it, not only for Korean but for all languages. The more members we have, the more content we will have in all languages, the better the interaction at the Forum, and the more resources we at LingQ will have to develop and improve.