I wanted to share this thought I had based on another thread where we have devolved into the old argument of “How many words you need to be ‘fluent’?”
I have made the argument that one can be fluent with 30K known words on LingQ for French, Spanish, or German, and of course the counter argument is “No, you need 50K to 100K” etc.
Here is my problem with that: If you’re acquiring words through reading and listening and marking on LingQ, AND you’re getting a LOT of speaking practice at the same time, two things will happen. 1) you will reach a relatively comfortable conversational fluency by the time you reach 30K known words on LingQ, and 2) your status as a “Person who Knows 30,000 Words” will last about TWO MINUTES. Because in the next two minutes you’ll add another 2 words, then 5 after that and soon you’ll be at 31K and then 32K etc. etc. And of course at the same time your conversation skills will continue to improve.
So this 30K milestone is not a stagnant state you’ve entered, but a fleeting moment on your journey. You’ll keep adding on vocabulary from different subject matters as needed. If you start a new hobby, the necessary vocab will be easy to pick up just by engaging in the activity.
And yes, if you keep talking and reading you will get to 50-100K fairly easily after that. But you technically don’t HAVE TO have those “extra” words (yet) to reach the stages of what we’d generally qualify as conversational fluency in a language. What you need is a solid foundation and a LOT of speaking practice.
BUT, here is the rub: A lot of us here on LingQ probably concentrate mostly on passive vocab accusation and mostly we are doing it from home, away from the countries of our target languages, and opportunities to speak are harder to come by, so in general, a LingQ user could acquire 40-50K++ known words, before they’d have the opportunity to get the amount of speaking practice that would make a person with 30K words fluent.
If you don’t converse in the language on a daily bases — which is fine, most of us don’t have the opportunity — your passive vocab may be a lot higher by the time you become conversationally fluent vs. a person who lives in the country and speaks the language fluently with quite possibly a lower set of vocab words.
I would say that the group of “People who happen to know 30K words at this particular moment” mostly break down into 3 categories*.
- People on LingQ, (or some other reading based method,) who reach a 30K word count, but who are studying from home maybe with occasional speaking: This group is likely NOT fluent with 30K words because they’re likely haven’t had the chance to speak enough yet.
- People who are living in country and speaking a lot, who happen to just have a 30K passive vocabulary for the next two minutes, but no one knows it, not even them, because they’re not on LingQ and they don’t keep track(but the ghost of Kato Lomb sees everything, and it’s 30K right now): This group is speaking fluently with 30K, no problem.
And the smallest group: - People who are on LingQ and have just hit 30K and also happen to be conversing on a daily bases, with lots of practice. I believe that members of this very small group would tell you they feel pretty fluent at conversations at this point.
Unfortunately, only this last group would be able to confirm my hypothesis, but I just have a feeling that most people who live in country may not stick around on LingQ once they get passed the 20-25K mark or so because things can pick up very fast for you from that point just by themselves in those scenarios, but I might be proven wrong.
*I don’t think you can get to 30K without being in one of these groups. If you’re not reading books on a regular bases in you TL, (group 1.) or you’re not living in country (group 2.) you won’t have enough input to be able to reach 30K. — I know what you’re gonna say: Netflix. But if you’re studying with subtitles, you’re reading, so you’re technically in group 1. Though my supposition would be that it would be unlikely that someone reaches 30K relying on subtitle based studies alone but someone may prove me wrong about that as well.