So, what is better for learning, memory, and building active vocabulary? SRS or just reading? There are people that swear by Anki, but reading hundreds of flashcards is boring to me. I completed the Basic Russian course on Memrise, but it severely flatlined for me when I tried other courses. Iâve become the opposite when it comes to learning. I enjoy reading and learning through context. I donât see how that is considered passive and less effective than SRS.
In a lesson, I encounter the word a lot and Iâm forced to actively recall what it is, but I have context as a hint. I consider this a type of âflashcardâ in a sort of way.
If Anki has its merits, I would definitely like to give it another shot. I just never understood it when people say âAnki is great, itâs so fun!â and they end up just reading hundreds of boring cards full of short sentences.
Any thoughts? And please spare the âdoes it matter? Just do what you enjoy bestâ comments. Iâve been seeing that a lot in language learning forums. It doesnât add to the discussion, because some of us like to learn the HOW.
Well, I guess everything has advantages and drawbacks. I do use flashcards now and then but Iâve come to believe theyâre way less effective than reading and trying to communicate. Whatever the theoretical virtues of flashcards may be, the fact that theyâre boring is a deal breaker.
My own opinion is this:
Reading/listening to interesting material is by far the best way to acquire vocabulary.
In order to activate vocabulary the best way by far is to just use it. Chatting with native speakers seems to be the best way to do that at my level of Russian, my current target language, for example.
Some flashcarding may be of help. I created my own version of the â625 wordsâ (with Spanish translations, not images) advocated by Bennie the Polyglot and Iâm going through those flashcards in Anki at times. I also copy the conjugations of difficult verbs when I come across them in my flashcard review.
I donât do any flashcarding at Lingq at this moment.
Reading is a form of SRS. 80% of language is a few thousand high frequency words, which will show up regularly in natural reading, and, at a natural spacing. The rest of the 20% of the words show up at their natural frequency, as the language is intended.
It´s weird that Americans and Canadians don´t celebrate Thanksgiving on the same day.^^
@topic
You just have to find a way to create interesting flashcards. If you don´t like short sentences, use longer sentences or even paragraphs. What about using cloze deletion? What about taking screenshots while watching media with L2 subtitles? Flashcards with audio? I´m sure you´ll figure something out.
@reading vs. flashcards Not sure if one is better than the other. Combining them is cool. I mostly use Anki for advanced vocabulary that I stumble across while reading/listening (expletive, jingoism, vitriolic, necrotic, multiplicityâŚ). Repetition is key when it comes to learning and getting enough reps âaccidentallyâ through lots of reading and listening will take longer than a combination of reading+srs or might not happen at all.
I don´t think flashcards make sense when you´re a beginner though.I mean, everything you hear or read exposes you to tons of unknown words.
If you donât get across that kind of vocabulary, my advice would be to go read more challenging material. Novels, for example. My experience has been the opposite. I use flashcards (usually mostly sentences or small fragments from introductory books) at the beginning of my learning. Later, I phase them out as I get more proficient.
Iâm going back to my âbasic 625â Russian words now, though, in order to activate that vocabulary, but Iâm still at an intermediate level at that language.
I never use flashcards for languages in which Iâm more or less fluent.
you can learn a language fine (better?) without Anki, but you canât without reading.
someone hit upon a fancy name (âSRSâ) for whatâs been there all along to make money/name for him/herself
Obviously anything, including Anki, is helpful compared with doing nothing.
But âis it better than doing just plain reading or listening with the same amount of time and energy?â.
I am kind of negative on it, because creating the deck means constant interruption of natural thought flow.
Anki would be great if you can create the deck without even thinking, or just by thinking for a second or so.
If itâs anything more than that, like stopping what youâre doing, clicking/typing something, etc, then itâs questionable.
My own conclusion: Anki may help in certain special circumstances, but not in general language learning.
I believe it hinders more than it helps for people like myself who are not disciplined enough.
I have to say that when I was doing flashcards on Anki (a couple months ago), I didnât like it at all because I was spending too much time on it, more than one hour/day just to review 100/150 flashcards. But now I started using Anki again and Iâm really enjoying because I find these hotkeys I can go much faster through the flashcards, for example: today I review more than 200 cards in just 20 minutes, so itâs much more fast and Iâll continue with that approach and see if I have good results. I also downloaded on Ankiâs website the " 8000 essential English words" to study (really cool website, with lotâs of decks that came with audio, image, phrase that you can download and import to Anki).
So my opinion is: reading is more powerful than just flashcards, but I think Itâs even more powerful if you join the two: reading+flashcards. And I kinda follow steveâs philosophy: " Focus 80% of your time in the big picture (listen and read) and the rest of the time you can do flashcards, review grammar rules, or whatever you want."
âIf you donât get across that kind of vocabulary, my advice would be to go read more challenging material. Novels for exampleâ
Have you read the edited verison of my post?
âI mostly use Anki for advanced vocabulary that I stumble across while reading/listening (expletive, jingoism, vitriolic, necrotic, multiplicityâŚ). Repetition is key when it comes to learning and getting enough reps âaccidentallyâ through lots of reading and listening will take longer than a combination of reading+srs or might not happen at all.â
This works for me If you prefer a different approach, we can just agree to differ.^^
â- someone hit upon a fancy name (âSRSâ) for whatâs been there all along to make money/name for him/herselfâ
Afaik, SRS means âSpaced Repetition Softwareâ and I can´t think of a less fancy name for it. The most popular software (âAnkiâ) can be downloaded for free and I´ve never even heard of a premium version.
+userstk Iâm a big fan of reading, as Iâve already said, and I think itâs far better in order to reach an advanced level.
However, as an experimental psychologist, I donât agree with you on your appraisal of SRS. While the principle has been know since Ebbinghausâs experiments, having an automatic algorithm available is very useful for learning data by heart.
I criticize an over-reliance on SRS for language learning because it is not primarily a matter of raw word learning but itâs a very useful method for other kind of material and as supplement in language learning. Iâd argue, primarily at the first stages.
Yeah, that´s why I think SRS makes more sense for vocabulary/expressions/whatnot that you will not encounter on a daily basis.I don´t need a â1000 most frequent words in xyz-neseâ anki deck though.^^
I am not taking issue with the technicality of the name âSRSâ.
They can name it anything they want.
I am just saying I donât particularly like the fact that they are presenting it like it is a great invention when in reality it is just a new name and dressing for what has existed hundreds or even thousands of years. As far as I am concerned, plain old reading and listening is SRS of the best kind. and our daily life is full of it too - thatâs why we can remember important things without always making conscious efforts.
If this new SRS or Anki method really does much good as they claim, it would be a good name for a good product. If not, it is a gimmick, a sham with a fancy name to dupe people. I personally believe the latter is closer to the truth, at least in general language learning.
You mention it is freely downloaded, but that is beside the point.
Every big user base or popular name on the Internet translates to money in the end.
And of course, I am not saying anything about you or anyone who loves SRS and makes good use of it.
I am just giving my opinion responding to a survey question.
Ok, but what I think is that it is probably more useful when you need to remember more randomized things than a natural language.
For natural language vocabulary, there are so much good texts, audio and video out there.
Why spend time on artificially created, boring, list-like things when you have better sources.
For language learning, I had a thought that it might be helpful when youâre (nearly) fluent.
That is, you have acquired a large vocabulary already but once in a while encounter some of those obscure words that youâre unlikely see again in months or even years. Then maybe keeping a list is useful, but I think it can be any plain word list for this purpose - just a thought.
In the beginning stage, I am not so sure.
But I imagine having good model phrases and texts organized well and going through them periodically would be a useful bootstrapping.
But SRS is, precisely, a way to âorganize wellâ material for periodical review.
Nothing prevents you from creating ANKI cards with phrases/sentences/text fragments. As a matter of fact, thatâs what I did whien I began learning Persian and Russian. Itâs much better than learning words in isolation. This technique has been dubbed âsentence miningâ.