×

We use cookies to help make LingQ better. By visiting the site, you agree to our cookie policy.


image

Healthcare Org 1, 4.11 (G) [CERT] Poster Submission and Evaluation

4.11 (G) [CERT] Poster Submission and Evaluation

Peer-graded Assignment: [CERT] Poster Submission and Evaluation Submit by Feb 2, 11:59 PM PST Important Information It is especially important to submit this assignment before the deadline, Feb 2, 11:59 PM PST, because it must be graded by others. If you submit late, there may not be enough classmates around to review your work. This makes it difficult - and in some cases, impossible - to produce a grade. Submit on time to avoid these risks. Instructions My submission Discussions

You have now Designed a Governance Structure for a Healthcare Organization. This task required that you synthesize course content to create your own healthcare organization and governance structure. It is now time to present your synthesized information to your learner colleagues as an electronic poster. The electronic poster file is an artifact of the course which you can circulate to colleagues or use for a talk or presentation event. You will also judge the quality (content presentation and format) of a poster. You submit your poster and peer-review the poster of two of your learner colleagues. Your poster is peer-reviewed by two of your learner colleagues. It should be noted that the main point of this peer-review assignment is for you to have the experience of critically judging (evaluating) the quality (content presentation and format) of a poster other than your own within a forum where your judgment has meaning. Your judgment has meaning because your judgment determines your learner colleague's grade on the poster assignment. Your judgment carries with it the responsibility to be critical, honest, fair, and consistent across all posters you judge; that is, the same responsibility found for any subjective judgment where the judgment outcome affects a person's life. In the best of all possible worlds, poster evaluators would first norm their evaluation against a standard. One method for doing this is to have each evaluator view the same sample of posters of differing qualities until the group of evaluators agrees on the same score to assign to each quality-level. This is not done in this course (although a sample poster is provided as an example) so it is reasonable to assume that different evaluators may assign different scores to the same quality-level characteristic. It is no surprise to any learner that some evaluators are harder graders than others. You may be a very hard grader; you may be a very easy grader. Those evaluating your poster may be very hard graders; they may be very easy graders. To account for the possible difference in the grading styles of those evaluating your poster (e.g., you are evaluated by two very hard graders), the passing grade is set at 50 percent (rather than 80 or 90 percent). Your grade is the combination of the grades (scores) given you by your two learner colleague evaluators. Note: If you do not achieve 50 percent (if you do not receive a passing score on the poster assignment) and believe it to be the result of having been evaluated by two unusually hard graders, please contact us to resolve the situation. Review criteria less In the poster project (assignment) for this course, the poster content criteria have been specified throughout the course as have the criteria for the poster appearance. Your poster will be judged by these criteria. You will judge two (2) other posters using the criteria. The score for each of the twenty-seven (27) evaluation criteria questions/items is: Yes (1 point) and No (0 points). In evaluating a poster on each evaluation question item, if the answer to the question is more Yes than No in your judgment, answer Yes to the item question. The poster display does not have to be perfect with respect to the evaluation criteria for a Yes answer/judgment. There is also an opportunity for you to provide constructive feedback or general comments on the poster to those whose poster you evaluate; and to receive such feedback or comments from those who evaluate your poster. Providing feedback is optional Example Submissions less Here are an example to help you understand what your assignment submission should look like.

Coursera_PD_HealthcareOrganization.pdf PDF File


4.11 (G) [CERT] Poster Submission and Evaluation 4.11 (G) [CERT] Poster Sunumu ve Değerlendirmesi

Peer-graded Assignment: [CERT] Poster Submission and Evaluation Submit by Feb 2, 11:59 PM PST Important Information It is especially important to submit this assignment before the deadline, Feb 2, 11:59 PM PST, because it must be graded by others. If you submit late, there may not be enough classmates around to review your work. This makes it difficult - and in some cases, impossible - to produce a grade. Submit on time to avoid these risks. Instructions My submission Discussions

You have now Designed a Governance Structure for a Healthcare Organization. This task required that you synthesize course content to create your own healthcare organization and governance structure. It is now time to present your synthesized information to your learner colleagues as an electronic poster. The electronic poster file is an artifact of the course which you can circulate to colleagues or use for a talk or presentation event. You will also judge the quality (content presentation and format) of a poster. You submit your poster and peer-review the poster of two of your learner colleagues. Your poster is peer-reviewed by two of your learner colleagues. It should be noted that the main point of this peer-review assignment is for you to have the experience of critically judging (evaluating) the quality (content presentation and format) of a poster other than your own within a forum where your judgment has meaning. Your judgment has meaning because your judgment determines your learner colleague's grade on the poster assignment. Your judgment carries with it the responsibility to be critical, honest, fair, and consistent across all posters you judge; that is, the same responsibility found for any subjective judgment where the judgment outcome affects a person's life. In the best of all possible worlds, poster evaluators would first norm their evaluation against a standard. One method for doing this is to have each evaluator view the same sample of posters of differing qualities until the group of evaluators agrees on the same score to assign to each quality-level. This is not done in this course (although a sample poster is provided as an example) so it is reasonable to assume that different evaluators may assign different scores to the same quality-level characteristic. It is no surprise to any learner that some evaluators are harder graders than others. You may be a very hard grader; you may be a very easy grader. Those evaluating your poster may be very hard graders; they may be very easy graders. To account for the possible difference in the grading styles of those evaluating your poster (e.g., you are evaluated by two very hard graders), the passing grade is set at 50 percent (rather than 80 or 90 percent). Your grade is the combination of the grades (scores) given you by your two learner colleague evaluators. Note: If you do not achieve 50 percent (if you do not receive a passing score on the poster assignment) and believe it to be the result of having been evaluated by two unusually hard graders, please contact us to resolve the situation. Review criteria less  In the poster project (assignment) for this course, the poster content criteria have been specified throughout the course as have the criteria for the poster appearance. Your poster will be judged by these criteria. You will judge two (2) other posters using the criteria. The score for each of the twenty-seven (27) evaluation criteria questions/items is: Yes (1 point) and No (0 points). In evaluating a poster on each evaluation question item, if the answer to the question is more Yes than No in your judgment, answer Yes to the item question. The poster display does not have to be perfect with respect to the evaluation criteria for a Yes answer/judgment. There is also an opportunity for you to provide constructive feedback or general comments on the poster to those whose poster you evaluate; and to receive such feedback or comments from those who evaluate your poster. Providing feedback is optional Example Submissions less  Here are an example to help you understand what your assignment submission should look like.

Coursera_PD_HealthcareOrganization.pdf PDF File