How do you manage reading?
TofuMeow

So i'm a compulsive reader that tends to read several books at a time. I find that being organized is the best way to read a lot. I've made a notion page (https://www.notion.so/Chinese-Media-143b34a975c4424282d88a15851b7524?pvs=4) if you are interested in seeing how I keep everything sorted and tracked. (I used to use Goodreads but they locked adding new books for people and I've found notion just so customizable!)
The key is to make reading targets (this is super easy to do in LingQ just by tracking the amount you read each day/ week) and dropping books that you dread opening. And make time and space for reading! After I get up (and meditate / yoga / chores) I read for several hours, then after my brain is melted I watch some trashy dramas / go to the gym. Then I have another reading period for several hours. I do this every day unless life or work gets in the way - key is consistency and habit formation over time.
I like read several books at a time since I find that switching every couple of chapters (30 min) helps retain my attention span especially in my target language - reading can be exhausting depending on the difficulty of the material.
I've personally found that while collected a "to be read" backlist is fun, you don't want to stick to it overmuch as life is short and some books don't fit with you at the time.
Also read fun stuff! I personally disagree with Adler's approach as that tends to suck all the enjoyment out of something that should be pleasurable - just read a lot of varied content and not just what someone else deems "The Important Classics." But I do take lots of notes! The note function in LingQ is my favorite thing and why I'll continue to stick with this site even though it's super buggy - writing down characters / proper names / motivations really helps keep the plot more comprehensible and I do enjoy reading a lot more.
llearner

Thanks for the reply. Most of your reading consists of content for entertainment in the language, which is the most laudable and enjoyable thing for language learners. Your ideas of interweaving reading activities with other tasks to improve attention span are also innovative and helpful.
I usually do a "background check" on the books to read via either Wiki or Goodreads. Some of the readings are needed to basis, and others are a must-know for natives, the latter of which I consider as common knowledge. For example, a native English speaker from the States would have read or heard the speeches I Have a Dream and Gettysburg Address at some point in their life, and commonly known honorifics in Chinese are just too practical to be ignored.
http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2016-06/16/c_129068022.htm
In addition to pursuing the classics guided by personal interest, there are other underlying reasons for me to choose classic works as mediums for specific ends. One of them is exploring and learning the essence of the culture through the language, such as commonly quoted allusions and historical contexts. While I am still in my "training mode" to cultivate my appreciation of literature, I want to acquire the basic skills of reading between the lines and picking up underlying hidden cues from the context. How do you deal with more literary terms or allusions commonly used in writing, as they affect the reading flowing and impede your enjoyment of the text to some extent?
Reading has always been fun for me. :-) Adler's approach is more suitable for academic works, treatises on a particular subject such as philosophy, or classics worth rereading multiple times. Adler's techniques are one indispensable tool but disposable in their usage per the reader's purpose and the nature of the contents. Reading for enjoyment has almost always been my goal in Chinese.
I should have done more note-taking too! I always admire the elegant style or succinct words employed by the writers to the desired and profound effects on the readers. Writing competently and formulating my writing style are good motivations for learning languages.
llearner

@TofuMeow
Sorry that I had been so engrossed in writing the reply to your post that I forgot to give thanks. I am much obliged for your valuable suggestions, especially on how you have managed to keep the reading task tidy on Notion, the routine work you shared, and note-taking. I appreciate it.
bamboozled

I guess everyone struggles to keep up with the amount of reading material. This problem will probably only get worse, considering the slew of AI generated content that is bound to hit the markets / the Internet soon.
But here are two ideas:
- Working in terms of projects by allocating a specific amount of time, such as one month, to focus on a particular topic. Prioritize the books you want to read within that topic, let's say "19th-century crime novels." Focusing on a specific topic with intensity can help getting though more material than usual and since there may be a significant overlap in vocabulary between the books you read on the same topic, it may make the process smoother.
- Using routines and habits, as popularized by James Clear and B.J. Fogg, is what I tend to fall back on when I don't have the time or energy to pursue a 'project'. For example, when I'm deciphering a book in Chinese, even if I had all day, I'd need a break after 1-2 LingQ lessons. So instead I can try to make it a habit to read first thing in the morning and before bed. That way I'll slowly but steadily make my way through a book.
llearner

Thank you. These are sound ideas that I can explore to my advantage. Sticking to the same writer on a specific topic is a good thing to do too. In addition, do we have to read a particular writer's works in a specific order to have good continuity, which enhances the comprehension and overall reading experience? For example, the Harry Potter series and Mary Karr's memoirs.
Thanks again for recommending Mortimer Adler's book, which I have read halfway. I already feel more empowered in my keenness to learn and apply these techniques to the reading. On the other hand, I wouldn't want to strip the novel down to the bare bone by being over-analytical and having minuscule details to contend with. What's the fine line to tread in between?
bamboozled

What's the fine line to tread in between?
I would say, Adler's ideas are mainly relevant in the context of the Great Books tradition. So, the idea is to focus on some select works that have stood the test of time and are considered the "best" humans have produced. And those are supposed to be worth deep study and multiple readings, the whole process spanning over a lifetime.
Books that one reads for diversion or just to extract some information don't warrant such study in my opinion. To some extent all of these things are somewhat controversial and ultimately subjective of course.
By the way, here is a video on the topic of the Great Books education: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5Tm-6nOUBA that might interest you. Professor Argüelles has some good points and he goes into more details regarding other sources for canonical works, in the two videos following that one.
llearner

In addition to Professor Argüelles' intriguing points on the background of the Great Books education, I find some of the questions and answers in the following video enlightening.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arpNlp2jWc4
When we read narratives for entertainment, we constantly search for the parts that resonate well with us for a better experience. I want to find a well-structured reference guide of related works on a specific theme comparable to a mind map in addition to the rich information in the videos. These related works may come in other forms besides narratives and span different disciplines, cultures, and eras.
I must admit my blunder in equating Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass with other biographies on the other thread. I bet Andy Dufresne from The Shawshank Redemption 1994 film shared a similar sentiment when he escaped the prison by crawling through a tunnel, although the two works are unrelated. Anyways, it's a beauty of the reading to relate seemingly random things surprisingly for a better understanding.
Tamarind

It really is overwhelming when I think about everything I want to read, so I don't. Instead I focus on my time, what I can do on each day. If it takes me four months to read ONE book in Korean, oh well, so be it.
llearner

It's good to focus on spending time and enjoying the process. Currently, I am reading three fiction and three nonfiction books in English. Light reading tends to go smoother, and some other works may necessitate more time to ponder between the lines. I want a more satisfactory and enriching reading experience by discovering what people do when reading multiple books.
Tamarind

I can't say that I 'read' multiple books at a time, but I always take breaks from the one book that I am reading to skim through other books that I find interesting. Sometimes this wandering will lead me to abandon the primary book for the 'side' book.
I feel no guilt about that whatsoever.
llearner

Interestingly, you mentioned abandoning the book for an alternative reading. I gave up reading a couple of books recently for different reasons. I found The Great Gatsby a good read, not so much the debut novel This Side of Paradise by the same author. Another book I discontinued is A Truth Universally Acknowledged: 33 Great Writers on Why We Read Jane Austen. It was only helpful and fair to read others' comments of the author with my first-hand experience of reading a few books by the writer.
One reluctant reason for quitting and continuing clinging to a particular book could be the sinking cost of time invested. I also wonder if famous writers' magnum opus is always a good read.