×

We use cookies to help make LingQ better. By visiting the site, you agree to our cookie policy.


image

TED 2014, What percentage of your brain do you use? - Richard E. Cytowic

What percentage of your brain do you use? - Richard E. Cytowic

An enduring myth says we use

only 10% of our brain.

The other 90% standing idly by for spare capacity.

Hucksters promised to unlock that hidden potential

with methods "based on neuroscience," but all they really unlock is your wallet.

Two thirds of the public

and nearly half of science teachers

mistakenly believe the 10% myth.

In the 1890s, William James,

the father of American psychology,

said, "Most of us do not meet our mental potential." James meant this as a challenge,

not an indictment of scant brain usage.

But the misunderstanding stuck.

Also, scientists couldn't figure out for a long time

the purpose of our massive frontal lobes

or broad areas of the parietal lobe.

Damage didn't cause motor or sensory deficits, so authorities concluded they didn't do anything. For decades, these parts

were called silent areas,

their function elusive.

We've since learned that they underscore executive and integrative ability,

without which, we would hardly be human.

They are crucial to abstract reasoning,

planning,

weighing decisions

and flexibly adapting to circumstances.

The idea that 9/10 of your brain

sits idly by in your skull

looks silly when we calculate how the brain uses energy.

Rodent and canine brains consume

5% of total body energy.

Monkey brains use 10%.

An adult human brain,

which accounts for only 2% of the body's mass, consumes 20% of daily glucose burned.

In children, that figure is 50%,

and in infants, 60%.

This is far more than expected

for their relative brain sizes,

which scale in proportion to body size.

Human ones weigh 1.5 kilograms,

elephant brains 5 kg,

and whale brains 9 kg,

yet on a per weight basis,

humans pack in more neurons

than any other species.

This dense packing is what makes us so smart.

There is a trade-off between body size

and the number of neurons a primate,

including us, can sustain.

A 25 kg ape has to eat 8 hours a day

to uphold a brain with 53 billion neurons.

The invention of cooking,

one and half million years ago,

gave us a huge advantage.

Cooked food is rendered soft and predigested

outside of the body.

Our guts more easily absorb its energy.

Cooking frees up time

and provides more energy

than if we ate food stuffs raw

and so we can sustain brains

with 86 billion densely packed neurons.

40% more than the ape.

Here's how it works: Half the calories a brain burns

go towards simply keeping the structure intact

by pumping sodium and potassium ions

across membranes to maintain an electrical charge.

To do this, the brain has to be an energy hog.

It consumes an astounding 3.4 x 10^21 ATP molecules per minute,

ATP being the coal of the body's furnace. The high cost of maintaining resting potentials

in all 86 billion neurons

means that little energy is left

to propel signals down axons and across synapses,

the nerve discharges that actually get things done.

Even if only a tiny percentage of neurons

fired in a given region at any one time,

the energy burden of generating spikes

over the entire brain

would be unsustainable.

Here's where energy efficiency comes in. Letting just a small proportion of cells

signal at any one time,

known as sparse coding,

uses the least energy,

but carries the most information.

Because the small number of signals

have thousands of possible paths

by which to distribute themselves.

A drawback of sparse coding

within a huge number of neurons

is its cost.

Worse, if a big proportion of cells never fire,

then they are superfluous

and evolution should have jettisoned them long ago.

The solution is to find

the optimum proportion of cells

that the brain can have active at once.

For maximum efficiency,

between 1% and 16% of cells

should be active at any given moment.

This is the energy limit

we have to live with

in order to be conscious at all.

The need to conserve resources

is the reason most of the brain's operations must happen outside of conciousness.

It's why multitasking is a fool's errand. We simply lack the energy to do two things at once

let alone three or five.

When we try, we do each task less well

than if we had given it our full attention.

The numbers are against us.

Your brain is already smart and powerful.

So powerful, that it needs a lot of power

to stay powerful.

And so smart

that it has built in an energy efficiency plan.

So don't let a fradulent myth make you guilty about your

supposedly lazy brain.

Guilt would be a waste of energy.

After all this,

don't you realize it's dumb to waste mental energy?

You have billions of

power-hungry neurons to maintain.

So hop to it!

What percentage of your brain do you use? - Richard E. Cytowic ¿Qué porcentaje de tu cerebro utilizas? - Richard E. Cytowic 脳の何パーセントを使っているか?- リチャード・E・サイトウィック Que percentagem do seu cérebro utiliza? - Richard E. Cytowic Какой процент вашего мозга вы используете? - Ричард Э. Цитович Який відсоток свого мозку ви використовуєте? - Річард Е. Цитович 你的大脑使用了多少百分比?- 理查德-E-赛托维克 您使用大腦的百分之幾? ——理查德·E·賽托維奇

An enduring myth says we use Un mit care dăinuie spune că folosim

only 10% of our brain. doar 10% din creierul nostru.

The other 90% standing idly by for spare capacity. Celelalte 90% stau degeaba în așteptarea capacității de rezervă.

Hucksters promised to unlock that hidden potential Hucksters a promis să deblocheze acest potențial ascuns

with methods "based on neuroscience," cu metode "bazate pe neuroștiință"," but all they really unlock is your wallet. dar tot ceea ce deblochează cu adevărat este portofelul tău.

Two thirds of the public Două treimi din public

and nearly half of science teachers și aproape jumătate dintre profesorii de științe

mistakenly believe the 10% myth. cred în mod eronat în mitul celor 10%.

In the 1890s, William James,

the father of American psychology, părintele psihologiei americane,

said, "Most of us do not meet a spus: "Cei mai mulți dintre noi nu se întâlnesc our mental potential." potențialul nostru mental." James meant this as a challenge, James a înțeles acest lucru ca pe o provocare,

not an indictment of scant brain usage. nu o acuzație de utilizare redusă a creierului.

But the misunderstanding stuck. Dar neînțelegerea a rămas.

Also, scientists couldn't figure out De asemenea, oamenii de știință nu și-au putut da seama for a long time pentru o lungă perioadă de timp

the purpose of our massive frontal lobes scopul lobilor noștri frontali masivi

or broad areas of the parietal lobe. sau zone largi ale lobului parietal.

Damage didn't cause motor or sensory deficits, Leziunile nu au provocat deficite motorii sau senzoriale, so authorities concluded they didn't do anything. așa că autoritățile au ajuns la concluzia că nu au făcut nimic. For decades, these parts Timp de decenii, aceste piese

were called silent areas,

their function elusive.

We've since learned that they underscore Desde então, ficámos a saber que eles sublinham executive and integrative ability, capacidade executiva e integradora,

without which, we would hardly be human.

They are crucial to abstract reasoning,

planning,

weighing decisions

and flexibly adapting to circumstances.

The idea that 9/10 of your brain

sits idly by in your skull

looks silly when we calculate how the brain uses energy.

Rodent and canine brains consume

5% of total body energy.

Monkey brains use 10%.

An adult human brain,

which accounts for only 2% of the body's mass, consumes 20% of daily glucose burned.

In children, that figure is 50%,

and in infants, 60%.

This is far more than expected

for their relative brain sizes,

which scale in proportion to body size.

Human ones weigh 1.5 kilograms,

elephant brains 5 kg,

and whale brains 9 kg,

yet on a per weight basis,

humans pack in more neurons

than any other species.

This dense packing is what makes us so smart.

There is a trade-off between body size

and the number of neurons a primate,

including us, can sustain.

A 25 kg ape has to eat 8 hours a day

to uphold a brain with 53 billion neurons.

The invention of cooking,

one and half million years ago,

gave us a huge advantage.

Cooked food is rendered soft and predigested

outside of the body.

Our guts more easily absorb its energy.

Cooking frees up time

and provides more energy

than if we ate food stuffs raw

and so we can sustain brains

with 86 billion densely packed neurons.

40% more than the ape.

Here's how it works: Half the calories a brain burns

go towards simply keeping the structure intact

by pumping sodium and potassium ions

across membranes to maintain an electrical charge.

To do this, the brain has to be an energy hog.

It consumes an astounding 3.4 x 10^21 ATP molecules per minute,

ATP being the coal of the body's furnace. The high cost of maintaining resting potentials

in all 86 billion neurons

means that little energy is left

to propel signals down axons and across synapses,

the nerve discharges that actually get things done.

Even if only a tiny percentage of neurons

fired in a given region at any one time,

the energy burden of generating spikes

over the entire brain

would be unsustainable.

Here's where energy efficiency comes in. Letting just a small proportion of cells

signal at any one time,

known as sparse coding,

uses the least energy,

but carries the most information.

Because the small number of signals

have thousands of possible paths

by which to distribute themselves.

A drawback of sparse coding

within a huge number of neurons

is its cost.

Worse, if a big proportion of cells never fire,

then they are superfluous

and evolution should have jettisoned them long ago.

The solution is to find

the optimum proportion of cells

that the brain can have active at once.

For maximum efficiency,

between 1% and 16% of cells

should be active at any given moment.

This is the energy limit

we have to live with

in order to be conscious at all.

The need to conserve resources

is the reason most of the brain's operations must happen outside of conciousness.

It's why multitasking is a fool's errand. We simply lack the energy to do two things at once

let alone three or five.

When we try, we do each task less well

than if we had given it our full attention.

The numbers are against us.

Your brain is already smart and powerful.

So powerful, that it needs a lot of power

to stay powerful.

And so smart

that it has built in an energy efficiency plan.

So don't let a fradulent myth make you guilty about your

supposedly lazy brain.

Guilt would be a waste of energy.

After all this,

don't you realize it's dumb to waste mental energy?

You have billions of

power-hungry neurons to maintain.

So hop to it!